H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jil Teichmann vs Bernarda Pera H2H: 2-0
Jil Teichmann holds a 2–0 lead over Bernarda Pera in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jil Teichmann leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jil Teichmann won the 2022 Roland Garros first round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 29
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 31
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2022* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Jil Teichmann | 6-2 6-1 | Bernarda Pera | Match data |
| Aug 19, 2021* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Jil Teichmann | 6-1 6-4 | Bernarda Pera | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jil Teichmann | #119 | #21 | 2,101 | 1,876 | 98 | 107 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Bernarda Pera | #314 | #27 | 1,519 | 1,836 | 97 | 125 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jil Teichmann | Bernarda Pera | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2019 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #69 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2020 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #127 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #37 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #69 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #35 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #147 | 1,613 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #62 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #93 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #123 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #44 | 1,754 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2026 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #119 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #65 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #71 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #157 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 |