Kai-Chen Chang
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuai Zhang | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jul 27, 2017 | H2H |
| Shuai Peng | 0 | 3 | 3 | Mar 2, 2017 | H2H |
| Iveta Benesova | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 30, 2012 | H2H |
| Tamarine Tanasugarn | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feb 10, 2012 | H2H |
| Qiang Wang | 0 | 2 | 2 | Oct 12, 2017 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Kai-Chen Chang vs Kurumi Nara H2H: 1-1
Kai-Chen Chang and Kurumi Nara are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Kurumi Nara won the 2016 Jiangxi Open second round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
1
2 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kurumi Nara | 7-5 6-4 | Kai-Chen Chang | Match data | Aug 5, 2016* | R16 | Jiangxi Open | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
| Kai-Chen Chang | 6-1 6-2 | Kurumi Nara | Match data | Sep 16, 2010* | R32 | Guangzhou Open | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kai-Chen Chang | #1,233 | #82 | 808 | 1,646 | 32 | 59 | 35.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kurumi Nara | #246 | #32 | 1,412 | 1,700 | 82 | 118 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kai-Chen Chang | Kurumi Nara | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #181 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #130 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2010 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #117 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #140 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #148 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #148 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #86 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #81 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #621 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #44 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #81 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #77 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #102 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2017 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #219 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–14 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,485 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #401 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,565 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #185 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Kai-Chen Chang | Kurumi Nara | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2009 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 19 | 2010 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2011 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2011 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2012 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2012 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2013 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 2013 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 15 | 13 | 28 | 53.6% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 14 | 15 | 29 | 48.3% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 24 | 2015 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 13 | 11 | 24 | 54.2% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 25 | 2016 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 26 | 2017 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2018 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 27 | 2018 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Career | — | 30 | 45 | 75 | 40.0% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | — | 60 | 83 | 143 | 42.0% | 15 | 19 | 34 | 44.1% | 7 | 16 | 23 | 30.4% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 84/91 of Kai-Chen Chang's and 181/200 of Kurumi Nara's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Kai-Chen Chang | Kurumi Nara | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2/2 | 0.0 | 6.0 | 64.4% | 53.1% | 26.3% | 39.6% | 57.1% | 43.8% | 40.1% |
| 18 | 2009 | 9/10 | 1.0 | 4.1 | 64.7% | 59.0% | 43.6% | 58.2% | 54.3% | 53.4% | 47.7% | 2010 | 6/8 | 0.2 | 5.2 | 59.3% | 45.6% | 37.8% | 40.2% | 43.8% | 42.2% | 40.5% |
| 19 | 2010 | 22/24 | 1.6 | 6.8 | 58.9% | 58.6% | 41.8% | 54.0% | 46.2% | 51.7% | 44.6% | 2011 | 5/5 | 0.0 | 3.8 | 67.2% | 51.3% | 33.4% | 46.3% | 53.8% | 46.8% | 37.5% |
| 20 | 2011 | 9/9 | 1.7 | 4.6 | 63.3% | 61.6% | 39.8% | 49.4% | 42.5% | 53.4% | 40.5% | 2012 | 4/4 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 69.4% | 54.6% | 40.3% | 44.0% | 63.8% | 50.0% | 43.3% |
| 21 | 2012 | 18/20 | 1.8 | 5.3 | 59.7% | 62.2% | 41.6% | 43.4% | 47.6% | 54.1% | 43.1% | 2013 | 11/11 | 0.8 | 1.6 | 73.5% | 56.2% | 50.9% | 50.6% | 51.9% | 54.9% | 45.9% |
| 22 | 2013 | 4/5 | 0.5 | 7.3 | 58.3% | 63.2% | 38.3% | 61.1% | 54.1% | 52.8% | 44.6% | 2014 | 40/44 | 0.4 | 2.0 | 74.4% | 54.1% | 45.8% | 51.6% | 49.3% | 51.9% | 44.6% |
| 23 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 31/41 | 0.4 | 2.5 | 73.2% | 57.8% | 49.3% | 49.8% | 50.8% | 55.5% | 39.5% |
| 24 | 2015 | 2/3 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 62.9% | 55.7% | 48.8% | 62.9% | 52.6% | 53.0% | 47.3% | 2016 | 32/33 | 0.6 | 2.5 | 70.0% | 56.4% | 47.0% | 55.2% | 50.1% | 53.8% | 45.3% |
| 25 | 2016 | 7/7 | 1.6 | 7.1 | 57.2% | 62.9% | 41.9% | 56.2% | 48.6% | 54.3% | 47.2% | 2017 | 25/26 | 0.5 | 2.4 | 67.5% | 55.1% | 44.4% | 45.2% | 50.1% | 51.5% | 45.8% |
| 26 | 2017 | 11/11 | 2.0 | 7.5 | 57.6% | 55.9% | 34.9% | 51.1% | 38.8% | 46.9% | 39.9% | 2018 | 13/14 | 0.6 | 3.6 | 65.3% | 57.2% | 43.1% | 51.9% | 39.6% | 52.2% | 40.9% |
| 27 | 2018 | 2/2 | 1.0 | 5.5 | 63.9% | 60.4% | 38.2% | 56.7% | 60.0% | 52.2% | 50.9% | 2019 | 6/6 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 68.3% | 51.3% | 37.7% | 40.9% | 47.3% | 46.4% | 40.8% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 75.6% | 44.1% | 9.1% | 40.0% | — | 35.6% | 30.6% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 5/5 | 0.6 | 1.8 | 73.5% | 58.6% | 50.3% | 59.8% | 61.3% | 56.2% | 44.6% |
| Career | — | 84/91 | 1.6 | 6.0 | 60.0% | 59.9% | 40.8% | 52.1% | 47.1% | 52.3% | 44.0% | — | 181/200 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 70.6% | 55.3% | 45.2% | 50.0% | 49.6% | 52.2% | 43.2% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Kai-Chen Chang | Kurumi Nara | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1513 | 103.3 | -1.75 | -1.06 | 0.713 | 41.9% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.40 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | -0.11 |
| 18 | 2009 | 1558 | 119.4 | -1.06 | +1.66 | 1.024 | 50.6% | +11 | — | — | 50.0% | +0.08 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–2 (50%) | 102.0 | +0.20 | 2010 | 1476 | 98.7 | -4.37 | -1.09 | 0.701 | 41.1% | +12 | — | — | 22.2% | -2.50 | 0–2 | 1–0 | — | -0.12 |
| 19 | 2010 | 1565 | 115.7 | -2.81 | +0.01 | 0.923 | 48.1% | +27 | -48 | +36 | 41.1% | -0.68 | 3–7 (30%) | 1–0 | — | -0.25 | 2011 | 1457 | 101.1 | -2.94 | -3.05 | 0.705 | 42.2% | +14 | — | — | 27.3% | -2.09 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.07 |
| 20 | 2011 | 1489 | 107.6 | -1.48 | -2.00 | 0.870 | 47.1% | +59 | — | — | 27.3% | -1.55 | 0–4 (0%) | 1–0 | — | +0.22 | 2012 | 1438 | 97.8 | -2.77 | -1.44 | 0.865 | 46.7% | +5 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.46 |
| 21 | 2012 | 1579 | 117.3 | -2.25 | -0.69 | 0.939 | 48.7% | +62 | — | — | 44.2% | -0.47 | 2–3 (40%) | 4–2 (67%) | 100.8 | -0.04 | 2013 | 1506 | 115.4 | -0.68 | +0.75 | 1.017 | 50.5% | +3 | — | — | 48.0% | 0.00 | 1–2 (33%) | 3–1 (75%) | 101.8 | +0.12 |
| 22 | 2013 | 1532 | 98.7 | -1.81 | -0.42 | 0.946 | 49.0% | +42 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.17 | 1–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.21 | 2014 | 1651 | 131.7 | -2.79 | +0.83 | 0.929 | 48.5% | -9 | -46 | -88 | 47.8% | -0.22 | 6–4 (60%) | 4–4 (50%) | 103.8 | -0.56 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1586 | 116.1 | -2.70 | -1.45 | 0.888 | 48.0% | +11 | +13 | -7 | 46.3% | -0.40 | 7–8 (47%) | 8–5 (62%) | 101.2 | +1.34 |
| 24 | 2015 | 1529 | 107.9 | -0.55 | -0.03 | 1.007 | 50.3% | +36 | — | — | 33.3% | -0.33 | — | — | — | -0.01 | 2016 | 1603 | 118.7 | -1.87 | +0.71 | 0.980 | 49.6% | +51 | -63 | -72 | 46.3% | -0.24 | 4–3 (57%) | 2–5 (29%) | 97.2 | +1.36 |
| 25 | 2016 | 1603 | 113.2 | -1.35 | +0.69 | 1.031 | 50.7% | +29 | — | — | 41.2% | +0.18 | 2–1 (67%) | — | — | +0.28 | 2017 | 1577 | 120.0 | -3.47 | +1.47 | 0.945 | 48.6% | +17 | — | -61 | 41.0% | -0.61 | 4–5 (44%) | 1–2 (33%) | 99.0 | +0.49 |
| 26 | 2017 | 1537 | 106.9 | -5.20 | -1.20 | 0.751 | 43.4% | +36 | — | — | 17.4% | -2.39 | 1–0 | 1–1 | — | -0.21 | 2018 | 1486 | 120.2 | -1.58 | -0.63 | 0.856 | 46.7% | +12 | — | +28 | 17.6% | -1.62 | 0–6 (0%) | 1–1 | — | -0.93 |
| 27 | 2018 | 1536 | 102.0 | -0.12 | -0.26 | 1.065 | 51.5% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.27 | 2019 | 1566 | 112.7 | -4.94 | -1.67 | 0.762 | 44.4% | -3 | — | — | 50.0% | +0.17 | 2–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.08 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1559 | 96.2 | +1.91 | -1.68 | 0.474 | 33.3% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.50 | — | — | — | +0.07 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1513 | 106.6 | -0.17 | -2.31 | 1.020 | 51.1% | — | +69 | — | 58.3% | +0.42 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.54 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1500 | 104.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1646 | 117.6 | -2.39 | -0.31 | 0.921 | 48.2% | +38 | -48 | +36 | 37.7% | -0.76 | 11–18 (38%) | 9–8 (53%) | 98.4 | +0.74 | — | 1700 | 121.9 | -2.51 | -0.03 | 0.906 | 47.9% | +14 | -23 | -39 | 42.2% | -0.58 | 26–33 (44%) | 21–21 (50%) | 98.6 | +1.34 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Kurumi Nara
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johanna Konta | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 14, 2018 | H2H |
| Yulia Putintseva | 2 | 2 | 4 | Sep 21, 2017 | H2H |
| Svetlana Kuznetsova | 1 | 3 | 4 | Aug 31, 2017 | H2H |
| Venus Williams | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 1, 2017 | H2H |
| Jelena Jankovic | 1 | 3 | 4 | Feb 2, 2017 | H2H |