H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kai-Chen Chang vs Yaroslava Shvedova H2H: 0-1
Yaroslava Shvedova holds a 1–0 lead over Kai-Chen Chang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yaroslava Shvedova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Yaroslava Shvedova won the 2011 Barcelona third round 6-3 2-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
KAZ
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2011* | Barcelona | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Yaroslava Shvedova | 6-3 2-6 6-2 | Kai-Chen Chang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kai-Chen Chang | #1,233 | #82 | 808 | 1,647 | 32 | 59 | 35.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Yaroslava Shvedova | #1,136 | #25 | 1,860 | 1,751 | 141 | 175 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kai-Chen Chang | Yaroslava Shvedova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #292 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #117 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #148 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #84 | 1,492 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #86 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #92 | 1,470 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #621 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #51 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #39 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #131 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #204 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #219 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #29 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #401 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #79 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #65 | 1,640 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #67 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #289 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #434 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |