H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Katerina Siniakova vs Anna Karolina Schmiedlova H2H: 1-1
Katerina Siniakova and Anna Karolina Schmiedlova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Katerina Siniakova leads 1–0 on clay, while Anna Karolina Schmiedlova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Katerina Siniakova won the 2016 Bastad fourth round 6-3 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 30
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 31
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2016* | Bastad | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Katerina Siniakova | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | Match data |
| Apr 10, 2015* | Katowice | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | 6-1 3-6 6-3 | Katerina Siniakova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katerina Siniakova | #34 | #27 | 1,718 | 1,894 | 227 | 241 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | #379 | #26 | 1,875 | 1,792 | 115 | 162 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katerina Siniakova | Anna Karolina Schmiedlova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #83 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2015 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #102 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #73 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #26 | 1,763 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2017 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 3–22 | 12.0% | #227 | 1,486 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2018 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #31 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2019 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #58 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #78 | 1,545 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2020 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #59 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #134 | 1,624 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2021 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #49 | 1,802 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #135 | 1,678 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2022 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #49 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,671 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2023 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #45 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 | 2022 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #103 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2024 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #45 | 1,809 | 0 | 5 | 2023 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #72 | 1,649 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2025 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #48 | 1,884 | 0 | 5 | 2024 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #110 | 1,648 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2026 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #34 | 1,833 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |