H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Katerina Siniakova vs Beatriz Haddad Maia H2H: 1-2
Beatriz Haddad Maia holds a 2–1 lead over Katerina Siniakova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Beatriz Haddad Maia leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Beatriz Haddad Maia won the 2024 Cleveland semifinal 6-3 2-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 30
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 30
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2024* | Cleveland | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Beatriz Haddad Maia | 6-3 2-6 6-2 | Katerina Siniakova | Match data |
| Mar 11, 2023* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Beatriz Haddad Maia | 5-7 7-6(4) 6-3 | Katerina Siniakova | Match data |
| Oct 19, 2022* | Guadalajara 2 | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Katerina Siniakova | 7-5 6-2 | Beatriz Haddad Maia | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katerina Siniakova | #34 | #27 | 1,718 | 1,894 | 227 | 241 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Beatriz Haddad Maia | #153 | #10 | 3,194 | 1,944 | 147 | 135 | 52.1% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katerina Siniakova | Beatriz Haddad Maia | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #299 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2015 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #102 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #246 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #174 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #71 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #31 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #58 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #121 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #59 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #49 | 1,802 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #49 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #15 | 1,847 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2023 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #45 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 | 2023 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #11 | 1,893 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2024 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #45 | 1,809 | 0 | 5 | 2024 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2025 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #48 | 1,884 | 0 | 5 | 2025 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #58 | 1,769 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2026 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #34 | 1,833 | 0 | 5 | 2026 | 0–11 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,537 | 0 | 4 |