H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kirsten Flipkens vs Su-Wei Hsieh H2H: 0-2
Su-Wei Hsieh holds a 2–0 lead over Kirsten Flipkens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Su-Wei Hsieh leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Su-Wei Hsieh won the 2019 Washington third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 40
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
TPE
Age 40
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2019* | Washington | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Su-Wei Hsieh | 6-4 6-3 | Kirsten Flipkens | Match data |
| Jul 4, 2019* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Su-Wei Hsieh | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Kirsten Flipkens | Match data |
| Aug 12, 2017 | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Kirsten Flipkens | 6-3 6-2 | Su-Wei Hsieh | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirsten Flipkens | #531 | #13 | 2,961 | 1,829 | 198 | 221 | 47.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Su-Wei Hsieh | #909 | #23 | 1,960 | 1,874 | 150 | 173 | 46.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kirsten Flipkens | Su-Wei Hsieh | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #164 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #380 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2004 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #202 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2006 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #104 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #129 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #157 | 1,419 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #111 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #81 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #81 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #314 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #362 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #192 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 13–4 | 76.5% | #54 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #25 | 1,689 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2013 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #20 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #86 | 1,558 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2014 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #45 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,545 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2015 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #85 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #93 | 1,583 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2016 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #65 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2017 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #74 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #82 | 1,600 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2018 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #47 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #28 | 1,768 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2019 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #71 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #32 | 1,777 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | 2020 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #86 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #67 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #311 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #108 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | 2022 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,685 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #713 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 |