H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:30 UTC
Kristina Mladenovic vs Shelby Rogers H2H: 2-2
Kristina Mladenovic and Shelby Rogers are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Shelby Rogers won the 2021 Charleston 1 second round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 33
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 33
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2021* | Charleston 1 | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Shelby Rogers | 6-4 6-3 | Kristina Mladenovic | Match data |
| Aug 1, 2019* | Washington | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Kristina Mladenovic | 6-4 6-4 | Shelby Rogers | Match data |
| Jun 3, 2017* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Kristina Mladenovic | 7-5 4-6 8-6 | Shelby Rogers | Match data |
| Aug 24, 2016* | New Haven | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Shelby Rogers | 6-1 6-1 | Kristina Mladenovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristina Mladenovic | #395 | #10 | 3,155 | 1,926 | 212 | 232 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Shelby Rogers | #437 | #30 | 1,698 | 1,875 | 126 | 138 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kristina Mladenovic | Shelby Rogers | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2009 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #300 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #352 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #426 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2012 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2013 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #55 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #126 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #67 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #72 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #29 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #151 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #11 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #59 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #43 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #630 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #39 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #50 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #60 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #86 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #40 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2022 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #152 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #47 | 1,820 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,432 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #149 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,442 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #341 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |