H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Kristyna Pliskova vs Qiang Wang H2H: 1-0
Kristyna Pliskova holds a 1–0 lead over Qiang Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kristyna Pliskova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kristyna Pliskova won the 2018 Prague fourth round 6-2 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 34
Left-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2018* | Prague | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Kristyna Pliskova | 6-2 7-6(3) | Qiang Wang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristyna Pliskova | #446 | #35 | 1,343 | 1,756 | 94 | 139 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,925 | 128 | 125 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kristyna Pliskova | Qiang Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #854 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #748 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #176 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #130 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #121 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 |
| 2016 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #60 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #67 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #69 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |