H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Lara Arruabarrena vs Louisa Chirico H2H: 1-0
Lara Arruabarrena holds a 1–0 lead over Louisa Chirico in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lara Arruabarrena leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lara Arruabarrena won the 2016 Seoul fourth round 4-6 7-6(4) 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 34
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 30
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2016* | Seoul | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Lara Arruabarrena | 4-6 7-6(4) 7-6(2) | Louisa Chirico | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lara Arruabarrena | #1,062 | #52 | 1,083 | 1,722 | 99 | 120 | 45.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Louisa Chirico | #382 | #58 | 1,020 | 1,668 | 19 | 45 | 29.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lara Arruabarrena | Louisa Chirico | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2011 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #170 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #111 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2012 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #79 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #102 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #208 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #88 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2015 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #86 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2016 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #66 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2017 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #84 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2018 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #82 | 1,573 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2019 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #155 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #220 | 1,508 | 0 | 2 | 2025 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #176 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |