H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Laura Siegemund vs Lin Zhu H2H: 2-0
Laura Siegemund holds a 2–0 lead over Lin Zhu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Laura Siegemund leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laura Siegemund won the 2023 Zhengzhou third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 38
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2023* | Zhengzhou | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Laura Siegemund | 6-2 6-3 | Lin Zhu | Match data |
| Jul 28, 2023* | Warsaw | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Laura Siegemund | 6-4 6-4 | Lin Zhu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Siegemund | #87 | #27 | 1,630 | 1,828 | 143 | 152 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Lin Zhu | #130 | #31 | 1,464 | 1,805 | 92 | 115 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Laura Siegemund | Lin Zhu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #134 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #176 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #98 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #124 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #31 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #113 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #69 | 1,792 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #120 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #113 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #75 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #91 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #51 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #84 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 2022 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,652 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #37 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #86 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 |
| 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #80 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 | 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #168 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 |
| 2025 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #46 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |