H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Lin Zhu vs Ajla Tomljanovic H2H: 0-3
Ajla Tomljanovic holds a 3–0 lead over Lin Zhu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ajla Tomljanovic leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ajla Tomljanovic won the 2024 Birmingham fourth round 6-7(6) 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 33
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2024* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Ajla Tomljanovic | 6-7(6) 6-1 6-4 | Lin Zhu | Match data |
| Jan 8, 2021* | Abu Dhabi | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Ajla Tomljanovic | 6-2 7-6(1) | Lin Zhu | Match data |
| Sep 14, 2018* | Hiroshima | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Ajla Tomljanovic | 7-5 6-4 | Lin Zhu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lin Zhu | #130 | #31 | 1,464 | 1,805 | 92 | 115 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Ajla Tomljanovic | #92 | #32 | 1,490 | 1,917 | 191 | 224 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lin Zhu | Ajla Tomljanovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #134 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #176 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #164 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #124 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #149 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #113 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #493 | 1,420 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #120 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #63 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #91 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #65 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #929 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #84 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #37 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #46 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #51 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #168 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #68 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #45 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #33 | 1,867 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #290 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #109 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #80 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #92 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |