H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Lin Zhu vs Daria Saville H2H: 0-3

Daria Saville holds a 3–0 lead over Lin Zhu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Daria Saville leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daria Saville won the 2024 San Diego first round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lin Zhu
China Age 32 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main-draw meetings
Daria Saville
Australia Age 32 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daria Saville #148 6-3 6-3 Lin Zhu #58 Match data Feb 29, 2024* R32 San Diego WTA 500 Hard
Daria Saville #195 3-6 6-1 6-4 Lin Zhu #33 Match data Jan 12, 2024* QF Hobart International WTA 250 Hard
Daria Saville #38 6-0 6-2 Lin Zhu #147 Match data Oct 13, 2016* R32 Hong Kong Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lin Zhu #173 #31 1,464 1,805 88 116 43.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Daria Saville #226 #20 2,135 1,858 159 156 50.5% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lin Zhu Daria Saville
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #539 1,493 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2012 1–1 50.0% #226 1,508 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2013 2–6 25.0% #149 1,462 0 0
20 2014 3–4 42.9% #134 1,520 0 0 2014 1–1 50.0% #233 1,483 0 0
21 2015 4–6 40.0% #176 1,512 0 0 2015 20–21 48.8% #36 1,675 0 0
22 2016 5–5 50.0% #124 1,555 0 0 2016 27–20 57.4% #25 1,836 0 0
23 2017 6–8 42.9% #113 1,577 0 0 2017 33–22 60.0% #25 1,794 0 1
24 2018 4–6 40.0% #120 1,546 0 0 2018 27–23 54.0% #35 1,781 0 1
25 2019 5–14 26.3% #72 1,628 0 0 2019 6–16 27.3% #242 1,603 0 1
26 2020 4–5 44.4% #91 1,605 0 0 2020 1–1 50.0% #450 1,617 0 1
27 2021 4–7 36.4% #114 1,563 0 0 2021 2–2 50.0% #419 1,645 0 1
28 2022 6–11 35.3% #84 1,592 0 0 2022 19–15 55.9% #53 1,738 0 1
29 2023 28–24 53.8% #37 1,742 0 1 2023 6–8 42.9% #204 1,686 0 1
30 2024 12–16 42.9% #120 1,656 0 1 2024 11–14 44.0% #108 1,667 0 1
31 2025 7–10 41.2% #168 1,680 0 1 2025 3–5 37.5% #197 1,661 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lin Zhu Daria Saville
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2014 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — 2014 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2015 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 13 17 30 43.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 2016 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 17 13 30 56.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 2017 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — — — — — 2017 21 13 34 61.8% 10 6 16 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 2018 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 18 14 32 56.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2019 5 11 16 31.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2019 2 8 10 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2020 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — 2020 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
27 2021 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2021 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2022 6 7 13 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2022 16 10 26 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
29 2023 24 19 43 55.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2023 3 5 8 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2024 9 9 18 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2024 7 7 14 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
31 2025 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 2025 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 79 92 171 46.2% 0 11 11 0.0% 9 13 22 40.9% — 105 101 206 51.0% 39 34 73 53.4% 15 21 36 41.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 200/204 of Lin Zhu's and 287/316 of Daria Saville's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lin Zhu Daria Saville
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 1/1 5.0 4.0 46.6% 59.3% 38.7% 44.4% 33.3% 48.3% 32.7%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 2/2 4.0 3.0 63.0% 65.8% 46.5% 33.3% 60.0% 58.2% 55.1%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 8/8 2.9 6.5 55.6% 56.5% 36.1% 47.6% 53.1% 47.6% 40.4%
20 2014 6/7 2.7 5.5 50.3% 62.4% 46.3% 59.1% 49.5% 53.1% 43.0% 2014 2/2 2.5 6.0 61.7% 57.5% 39.0% 39.8% 50.0% 50.3% 47.0%
21 2015 10/10 1.5 3.5 57.3% 60.4% 48.5% 50.0% 54.0% 55.4% 38.8% 2015 31/41 2.5 4.6 66.2% 62.3% 49.2% 54.6% 52.2% 57.6% 41.8%
22 2016 9/10 1.9 2.6 58.5% 63.5% 51.5% 60.6% 49.9% 58.4% 37.8% 2016 37/47 1.9 3.9 63.1% 62.0% 47.1% 52.1% 44.7% 56.5% 44.0%
23 2017 14/14 2.5 4.4 57.6% 67.5% 43.8% 48.6% 41.3% 57.3% 43.2% 2017 54/55 2.7 4.8 62.9% 64.0% 45.6% 46.7% 50.8% 57.1% 45.6%
24 2018 10/10 1.3 2.5 60.3% 61.6% 44.3% 51.9% 52.1% 55.0% 44.2% 2018 48/51 1.8 7.7 65.7% 62.8% 37.3% 53.1% 51.4% 54.1% 45.5%
25 2019 19/19 0.7 2.3 67.0% 54.9% 42.5% 40.5% 50.0% 50.7% 42.8% 2019 21/22 1.0 4.2 66.4% 56.8% 43.9% 45.7% 46.5% 52.4% 41.3%
26 2020 9/9 0.9 2.1 66.5% 60.0% 41.9% 49.2% 40.7% 53.8% 42.6% 2020 2/2 0.5 5.0 59.8% 62.1% 52.1% 75.0% 73.2% 58.6% 43.5%
27 2021 11/11 2.2 3.5 64.9% 60.5% 45.0% 55.5% 52.6% 55.1% 46.1% 2021 4/4 2.0 4.0 57.5% 66.2% 46.6% 52.5% 44.5% 57.9% 47.1%
28 2022 17/17 1.1 2.2 65.0% 56.7% 44.0% 51.7% 46.9% 52.0% 40.1% 2022 33/34 2.2 5.0 64.1% 64.5% 44.3% 58.4% 45.6% 57.5% 44.2%
29 2023 51/52 1.5 2.5 65.3% 61.7% 48.4% 55.9% 51.0% 57.1% 43.5% 2023 14/14 1.3 4.8 63.7% 61.1% 38.3% 45.4% 53.3% 53.3% 45.8%
30 2024 28/28 1.9 2.7 59.4% 64.1% 46.4% 44.1% 42.3% 56.7% 42.0% 2024 25/25 2.1 6.2 67.4% 57.8% 41.9% 59.3% 57.6% 52.5% 45.9%
31 2025 16/17 1.8 2.4 66.8% 60.3% 45.2% 47.6% 45.8% 55.3% 44.3% 2025 5/8 1.0 5.0 69.5% 56.9% 39.9% 48.9% 60.2% 51.1% 40.2%
Career — 200/204 1.6 2.8 62.8% 61.1% 46.0% 50.7% 48.0% 55.4% 42.6% — 287/316 2.1 5.3 64.3% 61.8% 43.5% 51.8% 50.3% 55.3% 44.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lin Zhu Daria Saville
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1494 101.6 +1.65 -1.80 0.633 40.7% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.01
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1508 107.7 +0.29 +3.39 1.317 57.0% — — — 50.0% +1.50 — 0–1 — -0.06
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1462 101.0 -2.47 -1.24 0.771 44.0% +3 — — 26.3% -1.63 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +1.05
20 2014 1521 104.1 -1.07 -0.56 0.918 48.3% +15 — — 30.8% -1.46 1–0 1–0 — +0.04 2014 1483 109.1 +0.25 +0.24 0.946 48.8% — — — 40.0% -0.40 1–0 0–1 — -0.01
21 2015 1512 107.1 -1.28 -2.85 0.871 47.4% +26 — — 45.8% -0.50 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +0.65 2015 1675 139.1 +0.59 +1.21 0.985 50.0% -73 -34 -29 50.0% -0.05 8–8 (50%) 10–6 (63%) 106.8 -1.55
22 2016 1555 109.1 +1.20 -2.59 0.910 48.5% +15 — — 50.0% -0.59 1–1 — — +0.66 2016 1837 143.7 +0.70 +1.71 1.011 50.3% -38 -114 -194 54.4% +0.28 7–5 (58%) 3–2 (60%) 104.2 -1.91
23 2017 1578 123.1 +0.74 -0.55 1.011 50.1% +10 — — 42.4% -0.12 3–2 (60%) 0–4 (0%) 98.9 -0.01 2017 1795 139.8 +0.45 +2.93 1.061 51.3% +20 -6 -173 57.7% +0.43 14–13 (52%) 7–12 (37%) 96.3 +1.08
24 2018 1547 117.4 -0.29 -0.28 0.981 49.8% +12 — — 47.6% 0.00 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — +0.19 2018 1781 141.0 -2.19 +2.60 0.991 49.8% +14 0 -108 52.2% -0.08 11–8 (58%) 13–1 (93%) 108.4 -0.58
25 2019 1629 125.7 -3.27 +0.44 0.867 46.7% +20 — — 30.8% -1.46 1–4 (20%) 3–4 (43%) 96.4 -0.49 2019 1604 107.6 -2.88 -1.35 0.868 46.7% +84 +22 +39 27.7% -1.28 4–1 (80%) 1–4 (20%) 99.5 -0.63
26 2020 1606 108.9 -2.09 -0.72 0.923 48.0% +18 — — 47.6% -0.62 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) — +0.71 2020 1617 108.7 +0.59 +1.52 1.052 51.9% — — — 60.0% +0.40 0–1 — — -0.14
27 2021 1563 105.8 -0.33 +0.99 1.028 50.5% -6 — — 40.0% -0.48 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 96.7 +0.09 2021 1646 128.1 +1.67 +2.64 1.117 52.5% +67 — — 50.0% +0.50 — 0–1 — -0.38
28 2022 1592 112.9 -3.24 -2.37 0.836 46.4% +24 — — 41.0% -0.77 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 96.0 +1.07 2022 1738 136.6 +0.54 +0.98 1.039 50.8% +82 -119 -95 53.7% +0.39 5–4 (56%) 1–5 (17%) 97.2 +0.65
29 2023 1742 140.5 +0.07 +0.82 1.014 50.3% -12 — -149 54.3% +0.16 7–7 (50%) 10–4 (71%) 106.6 -1.61 2023 1687 124.8 -0.97 +1.63 0.980 49.5% +59 +5 — 45.2% +0.03 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 97.6 -0.28
30 2024 1656 126.9 0.00 -0.71 0.971 49.4% +61 -323 -13 48.4% -0.24 2–6 (25%) 3–4 (43%) 93.5 +0.26 2024 1668 125.0 -3.56 +1.68 0.966 49.2% +38 -36 +6 45.9% -0.21 5–6 (45%) 4–4 (50%) 99.3 -0.44
31 2025 1680 133.0 -0.52 +0.63 0.991 49.7% +21 — -97 43.9% -0.34 3–4 (43%) 2–2 (50%) 100.7 -0.13 2025 1662 123.9 -0.99 -0.65 0.821 45.9% +19 — — 35.3% -1.06 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.37
32 2026 1644 106.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1805 129.3 -0.73 -0.31 0.955 49.0% +14 -323 -88 45.8% -0.37 25–37 (40%) 28–26 (52%) 98.2 +0.70 — 1859 140.0 -0.68 +1.60 0.990 49.8% +11 -29 -92 49.6% -0.03 59–51 (54%) 42–41 (51%) 102.9 -1.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.