H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Lin Zhu vs Donna Vekic H2H: 0-2
Donna Vekic holds a 2–0 lead over Lin Zhu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Donna Vekic leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Donna Vekic won the 2023 Monterrey semifinal 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 30
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2023* | Monterrey | WTA 500 | SF | Hard | Donna Vekic | 7-5 6-2 | Lin Zhu | Match data |
| Jul 31, 2015* | Baku | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Donna Vekic | 6-4 0-6 6-3 | Lin Zhu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lin Zhu | #130 | #31 | 1,464 | 1,805 | 92 | 115 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Donna Vekic | #35 | #17 | 2,458 | 1,908 | 230 | 232 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lin Zhu | Donna Vekic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #134 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #108 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #176 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #124 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #113 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #120 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #101 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #55 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #91 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #34 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #84 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #32 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #37 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,745 | 0 | 3 |
| 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 |
| 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #168 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #23 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #19 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #35 | 1,795 | 0 | 5 |