H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Lin Zhu vs Donna Vekic H2H: 0-2

Donna Vekic holds a 2–0 lead over Lin Zhu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Donna Vekic leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Donna Vekic won the 2023 Monterrey Open semifinal 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lin Zhu
China Age 32 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Donna Vekic
Croatia Age 30 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Donna Vekic #31 7-5 6-2 Lin Zhu #41 Match data Mar 4, 2023* SF Monterrey Open WTA 250 Hard
Donna Vekic #140 6-4 0-6 6-3 Lin Zhu #126 Match data Jul 31, 2015* R16 Baku International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lin Zhu #173 #31 1,464 1,805 88 116 43.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Donna Vekic #39 #17 2,458 1,933 243 239 50.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lin Zhu Donna Vekic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2012 4–1 80.0% #108 1,565 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2013 12–12 50.0% #96 1,603 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2014 12–18 40.0% #82 1,552 0 1
19 — — — — — — — 2015 10–10 50.0% #103 1,606 0 1
20 2014 3–4 42.9% #134 1,520 0 0 2016 4–16 20.0% #101 1,562 0 1
21 2015 4–6 40.0% #176 1,512 0 0 2017 16–21 43.2% #55 1,670 0 2
22 2016 5–5 50.0% #124 1,555 0 0 2018 31–24 56.4% #34 1,781 0 2
23 2017 6–8 42.9% #113 1,577 0 0 2019 35–24 59.3% #19 1,770 0 2
24 2018 4–6 40.0% #120 1,546 0 0 2020 8–11 42.1% #32 1,695 0 2
25 2019 5–14 26.3% #72 1,628 0 0 2021 16–15 51.6% #68 1,760 0 3
26 2020 4–5 44.4% #91 1,605 0 0 2022 12–13 48.0% #67 1,801 0 3
27 2021 4–7 36.4% #114 1,563 0 0 2023 26–20 56.5% #23 1,778 0 4
28 2022 6–11 35.3% #84 1,592 0 0 2024 31–20 60.8% #19 1,896 0 4
29 2023 28–24 53.8% #37 1,742 0 1 2025 14–21 40.0% #69 1,741 0 4
30 2024 12–16 42.9% #120 1,656 0 1 2026 12–13 48.0% #39 1,745 0 5
31 2025 7–10 41.2% #168 1,680 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lin Zhu Donna Vekic
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 11 15 26 42.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 7 7 14 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
20 2014 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — 2016 4 10 14 28.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 2015 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2017 9 16 25 36.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
22 2016 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 18 15 33 54.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 7 4 11 63.6%
23 2017 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — — — — — 2019 24 18 42 57.1% 7 3 10 70.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 2018 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2020 7 8 15 46.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
25 2019 5 11 16 31.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2021 12 11 23 52.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 2020 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — 2022 8 8 16 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
27 2021 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2023 15 12 27 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 3 10 70.0%
28 2022 6 7 13 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2024 12 11 23 52.2% 8 5 13 61.5% 11 4 15 73.3%
29 2023 24 19 43 55.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2025 9 13 22 40.9% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 4 6 33.3%
30 2024 9 9 18 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2026 2 8 10 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4%
31 2025 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 79 92 171 46.2% 0 11 11 0.0% 9 13 22 40.9% — 149 162 311 47.9% 39 42 81 48.1% 55 35 90 61.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 200/204 of Lin Zhu's and 444/483 of Donna Vekic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lin Zhu Donna Vekic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 4/5 4.3 2.3 52.3% 70.6% 53.9% 25.0% 53.1% 62.9% 44.2%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 24/24 2.7 2.8 56.0% 65.9% 50.9% 40.1% 46.9% 58.9% 44.8%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 30/30 3.7 4.4 53.3% 66.6% 40.9% 47.3% 54.0% 54.4% 42.1%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 14/20 3.9 5.6 57.9% 63.2% 43.0% 40.1% 45.4% 54.1% 38.4%
20 2014 6/7 2.7 5.5 50.3% 62.4% 46.3% 59.1% 49.5% 53.1% 43.0% 2016 20/20 2.9 6.3 49.8% 64.6% 39.8% 54.2% 52.4% 52.2% 40.3%
21 2015 10/10 1.5 3.5 57.3% 60.4% 48.5% 50.0% 54.0% 55.4% 38.8% 2017 36/37 4.0 5.3 56.0% 65.3% 45.8% 58.3% 47.7% 56.5% 40.6%
22 2016 9/10 1.9 2.6 58.5% 63.5% 51.5% 60.6% 49.9% 58.4% 37.8% 2018 49/55 3.1 4.7 55.1% 67.5% 44.7% 52.0% 48.1% 57.3% 45.4%
23 2017 14/14 2.5 4.4 57.6% 67.5% 43.8% 48.6% 41.3% 57.3% 43.2% 2019 59/59 3.6 4.3 57.1% 69.9% 47.5% 48.2% 52.0% 60.4% 45.0%
24 2018 10/10 1.3 2.5 60.3% 61.6% 44.3% 51.9% 52.1% 55.0% 44.2% 2020 19/19 2.9 4.4 58.0% 65.5% 43.7% 43.4% 45.6% 56.9% 42.5%
25 2019 19/19 0.7 2.3 67.0% 54.9% 42.5% 40.5% 50.0% 50.7% 42.8% 2021 28/31 4.6 5.5 57.2% 70.4% 45.8% 53.6% 44.5% 59.7% 43.1%
26 2020 9/9 0.9 2.1 66.5% 60.0% 41.9% 49.2% 40.7% 53.8% 42.6% 2022 25/25 3.8 5.3 56.6% 68.9% 45.0% 52.3% 57.0% 58.5% 41.5%
27 2021 11/11 2.2 3.5 64.9% 60.5% 45.0% 55.5% 52.6% 55.1% 46.1% 2023 46/47 4.0 5.4 56.0% 67.6% 44.2% 52.8% 51.8% 57.4% 43.6%
28 2022 17/17 1.1 2.2 65.0% 56.7% 44.0% 51.7% 46.9% 52.0% 40.1% 2024 44/51 4.8 4.8 57.2% 71.9% 45.2% 49.1% 46.5% 60.4% 44.1%
29 2023 51/52 1.5 2.5 65.3% 61.7% 48.4% 55.9% 51.0% 57.1% 43.5% 2025 22/35 3.0 5.8 53.4% 64.6% 39.6% 51.8% 43.1% 53.0% 41.1%
30 2024 28/28 1.9 2.7 59.4% 64.1% 46.4% 44.1% 42.3% 56.7% 42.0% 2026 24/25 3.9 4.5 58.0% 67.7% 45.2% 55.4% 38.1% 58.4% 40.9%
31 2025 16/17 1.8 2.4 66.8% 60.3% 45.2% 47.6% 45.8% 55.3% 44.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 200/204 1.6 2.8 62.8% 61.1% 46.0% 50.7% 48.0% 55.4% 42.6% — 444/483 3.7 4.8 55.9% 67.7% 44.9% 50.2% 48.7% 57.6% 43.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lin Zhu Donna Vekic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1565 114.5 +2.21 -1.39 1.193 53.0% +23 — — 72.7% +1.73 1–0 1–0 — +0.32
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1604 122.4 +1.86 +0.10 1.090 51.8% -25 — +81 50.0% +0.17 3–3 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 102.5 -0.09
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1552 122.1 -1.63 -1.74 0.922 48.4% +17 — +134 44.6% -0.50 5–9 (36%) 6–1 (86%) 100.6 -0.23
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1606 102.7 -2.51 -2.71 0.835 46.2% -21 -76 — 44.7% -0.74 6–1 (86%) — — +0.62
20 2014 1521 104.1 -1.07 -0.56 0.918 48.3% +15 — — 30.8% -1.46 1–0 1–0 — +0.04 2016 1563 111.8 -2.41 -1.13 0.843 46.5% +44 -99 — 24.4% -1.29 2–3 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 97.4 -0.76
21 2015 1512 107.1 -1.28 -2.85 0.871 47.4% +26 — — 45.8% -0.50 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +0.65 2017 1670 128.8 +0.13 -1.26 0.933 48.8% -42 -177 +56 45.8% -0.31 3–6 (33%) 5–8 (38%) 94.6 -0.63
22 2016 1555 109.1 +1.20 -2.59 0.910 48.5% +15 — — 50.0% -0.59 1–1 — — +0.66 2018 1782 137.0 +0.35 +2.36 1.063 51.2% -52 -181 -7 57.0% +0.37 4–11 (27%) 6–6 (50%) 92.6 +0.05
23 2017 1578 123.1 +0.74 -0.55 1.011 50.1% +10 — — 42.4% -0.12 3–2 (60%) 0–4 (0%) 98.9 -0.01 2019 1771 150.5 +3.02 +2.45 1.137 52.4% -24 -62 +25 60.0% +0.92 8–11 (42%) 4–14 (22%) 89.1 +1.18
24 2018 1547 117.4 -0.29 -0.28 0.981 49.8% +12 — — 47.6% 0.00 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — +0.19 2020 1696 131.1 +0.33 0.00 0.985 49.4% +28 -43 — 40.5% -0.26 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 101.7 +0.62
25 2019 1629 125.7 -3.27 +0.44 0.867 46.7% +20 — — 30.8% -1.46 1–4 (20%) 3–4 (43%) 96.4 -0.49 2021 1761 140.5 +1.94 +0.45 1.069 51.4% +17 — +73 52.1% +0.42 5–6 (45%) 4–7 (36%) 97.9 -0.11
26 2020 1606 108.9 -2.09 -0.72 0.923 48.0% +18 — — 47.6% -0.62 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) — +0.71 2022 1802 135.2 +1.22 +0.17 0.999 50.4% +25 — +9 50.0% +0.02 2–4 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 96.9 -0.92
27 2021 1563 105.8 -0.33 +0.99 1.028 50.5% -6 — — 40.0% -0.48 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 96.7 +0.09 2023 1779 141.0 +1.13 +0.49 1.024 50.6% +3 -119 +117 53.8% +0.22 11–7 (61%) 11–9 (55%) 104.1 -0.44
28 2022 1592 112.9 -3.24 -2.37 0.836 46.4% +24 — — 41.0% -0.77 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 96.0 +1.07 2024 1896 146.2 +3.22 +1.18 1.113 51.8% -95 -87 +112 57.0% +0.69 12–11 (52%) 6–10 (38%) 100.0 -0.31
29 2023 1742 140.5 +0.07 +0.82 1.014 50.3% -12 — -149 54.3% +0.16 7–7 (50%) 10–4 (71%) 106.6 -1.61 2025 1741 135.8 -2.37 -0.97 0.874 47.3% +6 +22 +152 41.3% -0.52 5–5 (50%) 2–7 (22%) 96.9 +1.04
30 2024 1656 126.9 0.00 -0.71 0.971 49.4% +61 -323 -13 48.4% -0.24 2–6 (25%) 3–4 (43%) 93.5 +0.26 2026 1745 136.4 +1.44 -0.81 0.983 49.6% -63 +83 +195 50.0% -0.07 4–8 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 98.3 +0.20
31 2025 1680 133.0 -0.52 +0.63 0.991 49.7% +20 — -97 43.9% -0.34 3–4 (43%) 2–2 (50%) 100.7 -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2026 1644 106.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1805 129.3 -0.73 -0.31 0.955 49.0% +14 -323 -88 45.8% -0.37 25–37 (40%) 28–26 (52%) 98.2 +0.70 — 1933 141.1 +0.87 +0.34 1.014 50.3% -15 -75 +82 50.5% +0.11 74–86 (46%) 59–76 (44%) 94.2 +0.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.