H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Lin Zhu vs Jana Cepelova H2H: 0-1
Jana Cepelova holds a 1–0 lead over Lin Zhu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jana Cepelova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jana Cepelova won the 2014 Hong Kong fourth round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 33
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2014* | Hong Kong | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Jana Cepelova | 6-1 6-3 | Lin Zhu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lin Zhu | #130 | #31 | 1,464 | 1,805 | 92 | 115 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Jana Cepelova | #894 | #50 | 1,074 | 1,685 | 55 | 91 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lin Zhu | Jana Cepelova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #134 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #176 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #111 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #124 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #76 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #113 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #56 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #120 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #100 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #91 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #108 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #188 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #84 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #158 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #37 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #168 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |