Lin Zhu
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesia Tsurenko | 1 | 3 | 4 | Oct 2, 2023 | H2H |
| Xiyu Wang | 3 | 1 | 4 | Sep 14, 2023 | H2H |
| Rebecca Marino | 3 | 1 | 4 | Jun 24, 2023 | H2H |
| Elise Mertens | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jul 1, 2021 | H2H |
| Diana Shnaider | 0 | 3 | 3 | Oct 17, 2025 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Karolina Pliskova holds a 2–0 lead over Lin Zhu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Karolina Pliskova leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Karolina Pliskova won the 2023 Canadian Open first round 6-3 6-7(8) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karolina Pliskova | 6-3 6-7(8) 6-2 | Lin Zhu | Match data | Aug 9, 2023* | R64 | Canadian Open | WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Karolina Pliskova | 6-2 7-6(4) | Lin Zhu | Match data | Jul 3, 2019* | R128 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lin Zhu | #173 | #31 | 1,464 | 1,805 | 88 | 116 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Karolina Pliskova | #57 | #1 | 6,940 | 2,045 | 430 | 248 | 63.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 6 | 17 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lin Zhu | Karolina Pliskova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #736 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #465 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #134 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #118 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #176 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #71 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 44–24 | 64.7% | #23 | 1,800 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #113 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,814 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2018 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #120 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #6 | 1,895 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2019 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #4 | 1,928 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 2020 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #91 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #8 | 1,921 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 2021 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #114 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 51–16 | 76.1% | #2 | 1,979 | 0 | 15 |
| 28 | 2022 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #84 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #6 | 1,916 | 0 | 16 |
| 29 | 2023 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #37 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #4 | 1,969 | 0 | 16 |
| 30 | 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #31 | 1,835 | 0 | 16 |
| 31 | 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #168 | 1,680 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #38 | 1,763 | 0 | 16 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #41 | 1,777 | 0 | 17 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #57 | 1,855 | 0 | 17 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Lin Zhu | Karolina Pliskova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2014 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 2015 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2013 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 22 | 2016 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 36 | 18 | 54 | 66.7% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 23 | 2017 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 37 | 19 | 56 | 66.1% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% |
| 24 | 2018 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 25 | 13 | 38 | 65.8% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 10 | 3 | 13 | 76.9% |
| 25 | 2019 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2017 | 37 | 12 | 49 | 75.5% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 6 | 1 | 7 | 85.7% |
| 26 | 2020 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 32 | 16 | 48 | 66.7% | 11 | 3 | 14 | 78.6% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% |
| 27 | 2021 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2019 | 34 | 11 | 45 | 75.6% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% |
| 28 | 2022 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2020 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2023 | 24 | 19 | 43 | 55.8% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2021 | 23 | 12 | 35 | 65.7% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% |
| 30 | 2024 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2022 | 12 | 10 | 22 | 54.5% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 31 | 2025 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2023 | 14 | 14 | 28 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 15 | 11 | 26 | 57.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% |
| Career | — | 79 | 92 | 171 | 46.2% | 0 | 11 | 11 | 0.0% | 9 | 13 | 22 | 40.9% | — | 289 | 160 | 449 | 64.4% | 83 | 56 | 139 | 59.7% | 58 | 32 | 90 | 64.4% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 200/204 of Lin Zhu's and 614/678 of Karolina Pliskova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Lin Zhu | Karolina Pliskova | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 15 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1/1 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 39.7% | 55.2% | 50.0% | 40.0% | 83.3% | 52.1% | 45.7% |
| 16 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 2/3 | 1.5 | 4.0 | 54.7% | 62.1% | 35.7% | 28.3% | 62.5% | 50.0% | 32.1% |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 63.1% | 65.9% | 37.5% | 57.1% | 25.0% | 55.4% | 31.7% |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 3/3 | 4.7 | 2.7 | 60.4% | 63.4% | 33.2% | 48.5% | 33.3% | 51.4% | 33.2% |
| 20 | 2014 | 6/7 | 2.7 | 5.5 | 50.3% | 62.4% | 46.3% | 59.1% | 49.5% | 53.1% | 43.0% | 2012 | 7/7 | 6.1 | 2.9 | 63.3% | 66.4% | 40.1% | 54.0% | 42.5% | 56.9% | 32.6% |
| 21 | 2015 | 10/10 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 57.3% | 60.4% | 48.5% | 50.0% | 54.0% | 55.4% | 38.8% | 2013 | 23/26 | 6.7 | 3.0 | 58.1% | 72.6% | 43.5% | 56.8% | 43.9% | 60.7% | 38.6% |
| 22 | 2016 | 9/10 | 1.9 | 2.6 | 58.5% | 63.5% | 51.5% | 60.6% | 49.9% | 58.4% | 37.8% | 2014 | 66/68 | 6.5 | 2.9 | 58.8% | 71.6% | 47.2% | 53.4% | 43.5% | 61.4% | 42.8% |
| 23 | 2017 | 14/14 | 2.5 | 4.4 | 57.6% | 67.5% | 43.8% | 48.6% | 41.3% | 57.3% | 43.2% | 2015 | 58/75 | 6.9 | 3.3 | 61.3% | 72.1% | 49.2% | 58.3% | 52.8% | 63.4% | 40.3% |
| 24 | 2018 | 10/10 | 1.3 | 2.5 | 60.3% | 61.6% | 44.3% | 51.9% | 52.1% | 55.0% | 44.2% | 2016 | 52/62 | 8.8 | 2.7 | 58.4% | 75.5% | 46.8% | 58.8% | 45.4% | 63.3% | 43.9% |
| 25 | 2019 | 19/19 | 0.7 | 2.3 | 67.0% | 54.9% | 42.5% | 40.5% | 50.0% | 50.7% | 42.8% | 2017 | 60/70 | 6.6 | 2.9 | 58.6% | 74.5% | 48.5% | 59.7% | 46.2% | 63.9% | 44.3% |
| 26 | 2020 | 9/9 | 0.9 | 2.1 | 66.5% | 60.0% | 41.9% | 49.2% | 40.7% | 53.8% | 42.6% | 2018 | 63/70 | 5.8 | 3.6 | 63.6% | 69.7% | 47.0% | 58.1% | 46.6% | 61.2% | 43.4% |
| 27 | 2021 | 11/11 | 2.2 | 3.5 | 64.9% | 60.5% | 45.0% | 55.5% | 52.6% | 55.1% | 46.1% | 2019 | 63/67 | 7.6 | 3.1 | 65.9% | 74.0% | 46.0% | 57.9% | 48.3% | 64.3% | 45.1% |
| 28 | 2022 | 17/17 | 1.1 | 2.2 | 65.0% | 56.7% | 44.0% | 51.7% | 46.9% | 52.0% | 40.1% | 2020 | 22/22 | 5.6 | 4.0 | 61.4% | 70.4% | 46.7% | 58.2% | 46.1% | 61.2% | 43.7% |
| 29 | 2023 | 51/52 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 65.3% | 61.7% | 48.4% | 55.9% | 51.0% | 57.1% | 43.5% | 2021 | 50/56 | 7.3 | 5.7 | 62.3% | 70.4% | 43.6% | 61.3% | 46.0% | 60.1% | 41.8% |
| 30 | 2024 | 28/28 | 1.9 | 2.7 | 59.4% | 64.1% | 46.4% | 44.1% | 42.3% | 56.7% | 42.0% | 2022 | 40/40 | 6.7 | 5.9 | 64.1% | 67.5% | 41.7% | 57.9% | 48.6% | 58.5% | 41.2% |
| 31 | 2025 | 16/17 | 1.8 | 2.4 | 66.8% | 60.3% | 45.2% | 47.6% | 45.8% | 55.3% | 44.3% | 2023 | 36/37 | 6.4 | 4.5 | 65.1% | 69.3% | 38.7% | 53.3% | 49.4% | 58.7% | 42.2% |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 35/37 | 7.1 | 6.9 | 64.5% | 68.0% | 42.9% | 61.2% | 50.7% | 59.0% | 41.3% |
| 34 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 32/33 | 3.6 | 5.6 | 65.3% | 66.9% | 42.3% | 54.1% | 52.7% | 58.4% | 40.8% |
| Career | — | 200/204 | 1.6 | 2.8 | 62.8% | 61.1% | 46.0% | 50.7% | 48.0% | 55.4% | 42.6% | — | 614/679 | 6.7 | 3.9 | 62.0% | 71.2% | 45.3% | 57.5% | 47.5% | 61.3% | 42.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Lin Zhu | Karolina Pliskova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1491 | 98.9 | -2.80 | -7.65 | 0.953 | 48.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -1.50 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.16 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1531 | 101.3 | -0.28 | -0.31 | 0.643 | 42.7% | — | +24 | — | 57.1% | -0.71 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.42 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1522 | 99.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.33 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.16 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1504 | 97.5 | -1.06 | +0.20 | 0.710 | 44.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | +0.13 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1468 | 97.1 | +1.66 | -2.13 | 0.683 | 42.9% | — | — | — | 14.3% | -2.43 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.18 |
| 20 | 2014 | 1521 | 104.1 | -1.07 | -0.56 | 0.918 | 48.3% | +15 | — | — | 30.8% | -1.46 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | +0.04 | 2012 | 1445 | 104.0 | +1.53 | -4.70 | 0.756 | 45.0% | +44 | — | — | 14.3% | -2.14 | — | — | — | -0.46 |
| 21 | 2015 | 1512 | 107.1 | -1.28 | -2.85 | 0.871 | 47.4% | +26 | — | — | 45.8% | -0.50 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–1 | — | +0.65 | 2013 | 1515 | 116.1 | +2.68 | -3.87 | 0.984 | 49.7% | +34 | -71 | +36 | 45.0% | -0.27 | 3–5 (38%) | 1–2 (33%) | 98.0 | -0.31 |
| 22 | 2016 | 1555 | 109.1 | +1.20 | -2.59 | 0.910 | 48.5% | +15 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.59 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.66 | 2014 | 1801 | 141.2 | +4.39 | -0.61 | 1.109 | 51.9% | 0 | -220 | -224 | 60.9% | +0.70 | 15–10 (60%) | 10–7 (59%) | 106.9 | +0.20 |
| 23 | 2017 | 1578 | 123.1 | +0.74 | -0.55 | 1.011 | 50.1% | +10 | — | — | 42.4% | -0.12 | 3–2 (60%) | 0–4 (0%) | 98.9 | -0.01 | 2015 | 1815 | 145.3 | +4.92 | -0.94 | 1.100 | 51.8% | +19 | -177 | -128 | 60.8% | +0.67 | 19–7 (73%) | 13–11 (54%) | 108.0 | +2.74 |
| 24 | 2018 | 1547 | 117.4 | -0.29 | -0.28 | 0.981 | 49.8% | +12 | — | — | 47.6% | 0.00 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–0 | — | +0.19 | 2016 | 1896 | 151.5 | +6.52 | +1.70 | 1.194 | 53.3% | +6 | -233 | -105 | 61.9% | +0.99 | 11–6 (65%) | 9–14 (39%) | 101.0 | -0.57 |
| 25 | 2019 | 1629 | 125.7 | -3.27 | +0.44 | 0.867 | 46.7% | +20 | — | — | 30.8% | -1.46 | 1–4 (20%) | 3–4 (43%) | 96.4 | -0.49 | 2017 | 1929 | 157.4 | +7.32 | +1.47 | 1.225 | 53.9% | +22 | -159 | -42 | 68.6% | +1.31 | 12–7 (63%) | 8–11 (42%) | 99.8 | +1.32 |
| 26 | 2020 | 1606 | 108.9 | -2.09 | -0.72 | 0.923 | 48.0% | +18 | — | — | 47.6% | -0.62 | 1–2 (33%) | 3–1 (75%) | — | +0.71 | 2018 | 1921 | 156.9 | +4.54 | +1.21 | 1.118 | 52.1% | +3 | +8 | -35 | 62.5% | +0.75 | 16–6 (73%) | 12–8 (60%) | 105.8 | -0.73 |
| 27 | 2021 | 1563 | 105.8 | -0.33 | +0.99 | 1.028 | 50.5% | -6 | — | — | 40.0% | -0.48 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–3 (25%) | 96.7 | +0.09 | 2019 | 1980 | 157.5 | +7.44 | +2.67 | 1.263 | 54.4% | +1 | -8 | -3 | 68.7% | +1.37 | 19–12 (61%) | 8–8 (50%) | 98.3 | +1.00 |
| 28 | 2022 | 1592 | 112.9 | -3.24 | -2.37 | 0.836 | 46.4% | +24 | — | — | 41.0% | -0.77 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–3 (40%) | 96.0 | +1.07 | 2020 | 1917 | 146.8 | +3.25 | +0.83 | 1.125 | 52.4% | -13 | +73 | — | 58.8% | +0.96 | 5–2 (71%) | 2–7 (22%) | 97.0 | -0.18 |
| 29 | 2023 | 1742 | 140.5 | +0.07 | +0.82 | 1.014 | 50.3% | -12 | — | -149 | 54.3% | +0.16 | 7–7 (50%) | 10–4 (71%) | 106.6 | -1.61 | 2021 | 1970 | 149.6 | +3.90 | +0.30 | 1.047 | 51.1% | -17 | +46 | +115 | 59.8% | +0.56 | 13–4 (76%) | 8–6 (57%) | 104.7 | +1.20 |
| 30 | 2024 | 1656 | 126.9 | 0.00 | -0.71 | 0.971 | 49.4% | +61 | -323 | -13 | 48.4% | -0.24 | 2–6 (25%) | 3–4 (43%) | 93.5 | +0.26 | 2022 | 1836 | 136.2 | +1.10 | -0.03 | 0.992 | 50.1% | +34 | +46 | +173 | 48.5% | +0.10 | 12–5 (71%) | 6–9 (40%) | 97.8 | +1.04 |
| 31 | 2025 | 1680 | 133.0 | -0.52 | +0.63 | 0.991 | 49.7% | +20 | — | -97 | 43.9% | -0.34 | 3–4 (43%) | 2–2 (50%) | 100.7 | -0.13 | 2023 | 1763 | 149.7 | +2.46 | +0.60 | 1.021 | 50.2% | +68 | +75 | +144 | 48.1% | +0.15 | 4–7 (36%) | 1–8 (11%) | 87.6 | +0.27 |
| 32 | 2026 | 1644 | 106.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1778 | 141.4 | +1.97 | -0.71 | 1.007 | 50.4% | +61 | -2 | +155 | 56.2% | +0.14 | 9–10 (47%) | 9–5 (64%) | 100.9 | -0.55 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1728 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1856 | 135.9 | +1.06 | -1.25 | 0.979 | 49.3% | -58 | +30 | +102 | 58.9% | -0.01 | 8–3 (73%) | 8–3 (73%) | 108.7 | +0.36 |
| Career | — | 1805 | 129.3 | -0.73 | -0.31 | 0.955 | 49.0% | +14 | -323 | -88 | 45.8% | -0.37 | 25–37 (40%) | 28–26 (52%) | 98.2 | +0.70 | — | 2045 | 152.8 | +4.37 | +0.29 | 1.095 | 51.7% | +14 | -53 | +11 | 59.3% | +0.63 | 147–86 (63%) | 96–100 (49%) | 101.2 | +0.73 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesia Tsurenko | 1 | 3 | 4 | Oct 2, 2023 | H2H |
| Xiyu Wang | 3 | 1 | 4 | Sep 14, 2023 | H2H |
| Rebecca Marino | 3 | 1 | 4 | Jun 24, 2023 | H2H |
| Elise Mertens | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jul 1, 2021 | H2H |
| Diana Shnaider | 0 | 3 | 3 | Oct 17, 2025 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donna Vekic | 7 | 4 | 11 | Jun 12, 2026 | H2H |
| Jelena Ostapenko | 5 | 6 | 11 | Jan 5, 2024 | H2H |
| Angelique Kerber | 4 | 7 | 11 | Jun 30, 2019 | H2H |
| Garbiñe Muguruza | 8 | 2 | 10 | Nov 10, 2021 | H2H |
| Simona Halep | 3 | 7 | 10 | Sep 21, 2020 | H2H |