H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Lin Zhu vs Madison Brengle H2H: 1-0

Lin Zhu holds a 1–0 lead over Madison Brengle in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lin Zhu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lin Zhu won the 2023 ASB Classic first round 4-6 7-6(6) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lin Zhu
China Age 32 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Madison Brengle
United States Age 36 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lin Zhu #84 4-6 7-6(6) 6-4 Madison Brengle #57 Match data Jan 5, 2023* R32 ASB Classic WTA 250 Hard
Lin Zhu #108 6-1 6-3 Madison Brengle #97 Match data Feb 10, 2019 Q2 Q Qatar Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lin Zhu #173 #31 1,464 1,805 88 116 43.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Madison Brengle #212 #35 1,324 1,722 94 152 38.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lin Zhu Madison Brengle
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2007 1–3 25.0% #229 1,501 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2008 0–3 0.0% #220 1,457 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2009 1–2 33.3% #165 1,457 0 0
20 2014 3–4 42.9% #134 1,520 0 0 2010 0–1 0.0% #188 1,447 0 0
21 2015 4–6 40.0% #176 1,512 0 0 2011 1–1 50.0% #197 1,460 0 0
22 2016 5–5 50.0% #124 1,555 0 0 2012 0–1 0.0% #191 1,444 0 0
23 2017 6–8 42.9% #113 1,577 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2018 4–6 40.0% #120 1,546 0 0 2014 4–4 50.0% #95 1,474 0 0
25 2019 5–14 26.3% #72 1,628 0 0 2015 25–26 49.0% #40 1,622 0 0
26 2020 4–5 44.4% #91 1,605 0 0 2016 16–23 41.0% #73 1,591 0 0
27 2021 4–7 36.4% #114 1,563 0 0 2017 10–18 35.7% #83 1,654 0 0
28 2022 6–11 35.3% #84 1,592 0 0 2018 3–11 21.4% #88 1,604 0 0
29 2023 28–24 53.8% #37 1,742 0 1 2019 7–11 38.9% #95 1,601 0 0
30 2024 12–16 42.9% #120 1,656 0 1 2020 2–4 33.3% #82 1,644 0 0
31 2025 7–10 41.2% #168 1,680 0 1 2021 6–14 30.0% #59 1,645 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2022 12–16 42.9% #57 1,630 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2023 6–14 30.0% #151 1,583 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lin Zhu Madison Brengle
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2014 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2015 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2016 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2017 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2018 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2019 5 11 16 31.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 19 16 35 54.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2020 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — 2016 10 16 26 38.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
27 2021 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2017 6 14 20 30.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 2022 6 7 13 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2018 1 7 8 12.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2023 24 19 43 55.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 2024 9 9 18 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2020 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2025 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 2021 2 8 10 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 4 9 13 30.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
Career — 79 92 171 46.2% 0 11 11 0.0% 9 13 22 40.9% — 65 103 168 38.7% 17 31 48 35.4% 12 18 30 40.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 200/204 of Lin Zhu's and 225/246 of Madison Brengle's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lin Zhu Madison Brengle
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 4/4 0.8 3.0 60.2% 57.4% 40.8% 48.9% 50.7% 50.5% 41.0%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 2/3 0.0 3.0 66.3% 49.4% 35.3% 12.5% 63.6% 45.2% 37.3%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 3/3 0.0 3.7 61.8% 56.2% 38.6% 41.1% 37.6% 49.3% 43.5%
20 2014 6/7 2.7 5.5 50.3% 62.4% 46.3% 59.1% 49.5% 53.1% 43.0% 2010 1/1 1.0 7.0 53.7% 44.4% 38.7% 50.0% 50.0% 41.8% 47.2%
21 2015 10/10 1.5 3.5 57.3% 60.4% 48.5% 50.0% 54.0% 55.4% 38.8% 2011 2/2 0.5 3.5 63.9% 56.3% 44.7% 38.9% 40.0% 52.0% 35.6%
22 2016 9/10 1.9 2.6 58.5% 63.5% 51.5% 60.6% 49.9% 58.4% 37.8% 2012 1/1 5.0 8.0 65.2% 61.3% 35.0% 30.0% 83.3% 52.2% 41.7%
23 2017 14/14 2.5 4.4 57.6% 67.5% 43.8% 48.6% 41.3% 57.3% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2018 10/10 1.3 2.5 60.3% 61.6% 44.3% 51.9% 52.1% 55.0% 44.2% 2014 7/8 0.7 3.0 66.2% 62.5% 42.8% 49.4% 47.3% 55.7% 44.3%
25 2019 19/19 0.7 2.3 67.0% 54.9% 42.5% 40.5% 50.0% 50.7% 42.8% 2015 35/51 1.7 1.9 66.0% 61.5% 48.8% 42.8% 46.6% 57.2% 41.3%
26 2020 9/9 0.9 2.1 66.5% 60.0% 41.9% 49.2% 40.7% 53.8% 42.6% 2016 37/39 0.9 2.2 68.5% 56.8% 45.7% 46.0% 54.9% 53.2% 43.1%
27 2021 11/11 2.2 3.5 64.9% 60.5% 45.0% 55.5% 52.6% 55.1% 46.1% 2017 28/28 0.1 2.5 73.3% 54.5% 39.2% 43.7% 45.2% 50.6% 44.1%
28 2022 17/17 1.1 2.2 65.0% 56.7% 44.0% 51.7% 46.9% 52.0% 40.1% 2018 14/14 0.4 2.7 66.6% 50.4% 43.5% 42.0% 45.0% 48.4% 43.5%
29 2023 51/52 1.5 2.5 65.3% 61.7% 48.4% 55.9% 51.0% 57.1% 43.5% 2019 18/18 0.2 2.2 73.8% 51.9% 37.5% 39.8% 54.6% 48.3% 47.2%
30 2024 28/28 1.9 2.7 59.4% 64.1% 46.4% 44.1% 42.3% 56.7% 42.0% 2020 6/6 0.2 3.7 72.6% 50.8% 44.5% 45.3% 38.1% 49.0% 48.3%
31 2025 16/17 1.8 2.4 66.8% 60.3% 45.2% 47.6% 45.8% 55.3% 44.3% 2021 20/20 0.0 3.1 74.5% 55.6% 39.8% 42.5% 48.0% 51.4% 44.1%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 27/28 0.4 2.9 73.1% 55.8% 39.7% 41.5% 47.1% 51.3% 44.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 20/20 0.3 2.7 75.1% 54.6% 41.7% 40.9% 51.5% 51.4% 43.0%
Career — 200/204 1.6 2.8 62.8% 61.1% 46.0% 50.7% 48.0% 55.4% 42.6% — 225/246 0.6 2.6 70.3% 55.9% 42.5% 42.8% 49.0% 52.0% 43.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lin Zhu Madison Brengle
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1502 111.1 0.00 +0.02 0.829 46.5% +16 — — 25.0% -1.75 — — — -0.27
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1458 92.5 -3.04 -1.39 0.681 41.4% — — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — +0.40
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1457 101.5 -2.95 -0.91 0.858 46.1% — — — 33.3% -1.17 — 0–1 — +0.06
20 2014 1521 104.1 -1.07 -0.56 0.918 48.3% +15 — — 30.8% -1.46 1–0 1–0 — +0.04 2010 1447 99.2 -3.58 -2.65 0.810 44.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — 0.00
21 2015 1512 107.1 -1.28 -2.85 0.871 47.4% +26 — — 45.8% -0.50 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +0.65 2011 1460 101.5 -2.09 -1.94 0.741 44.6% — — — 50.0% -1.25 — 1–0 — +0.03
22 2016 1555 109.1 +1.20 -2.59 0.910 48.5% +15 — — 50.0% -0.59 1–1 — — +0.66 2012 1444 99.4 -2.21 +0.67 0.871 47.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.16
23 2017 1578 123.1 +0.74 -0.55 1.011 50.1% +10 — — 42.4% -0.12 3–2 (60%) 0–4 (0%) 98.9 -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2018 1547 117.4 -0.29 -0.28 0.981 49.8% +12 — — 47.6% 0.00 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — +0.19 2014 1474 113.6 -0.29 +1.12 1.002 50.0% +31 — — 42.9% -0.64 0–2 1–1 — +0.14
25 2019 1629 125.7 -3.27 +0.44 0.867 46.7% +20 — — 30.8% -1.46 1–4 (20%) 3–4 (43%) 96.4 -0.49 2015 1622 128.8 -0.60 -0.18 0.964 49.3% +5 -83 — 48.7% -0.07 7–8 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 100.8 +0.20
26 2020 1606 108.9 -2.09 -0.72 0.923 48.0% +18 — — 47.6% -0.62 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) — +0.71 2016 1592 127.1 -1.99 +0.54 0.921 48.3% +5 -75 +29 42.4% -0.75 7–6 (54%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 -1.69
27 2021 1563 105.8 -0.33 +0.99 1.028 50.5% -6 — — 40.0% -0.48 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 96.7 +0.09 2017 1654 130.5 -4.01 +1.14 0.892 47.3% -26 -55 -1 38.2% -0.78 6–6 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 102.1 -1.74
28 2022 1592 112.9 -3.24 -2.37 0.836 46.4% +24 — — 41.0% -0.77 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 96.0 +1.07 2018 1605 118.6 -4.52 +0.81 0.843 45.8% -20 -29 — 33.3% -1.36 2–5 (29%) 0–2 — -1.35
29 2023 1742 140.5 +0.07 +0.82 1.014 50.3% -12 — -149 54.3% +0.16 7–7 (50%) 10–4 (71%) 106.6 -1.61 2019 1602 115.2 -5.23 +2.99 0.913 47.8% -46 -26 — 42.1% -0.68 0–2 2–1 (67%) — -0.29
30 2024 1656 126.9 0.00 -0.71 0.971 49.4% +61 -323 -13 48.4% -0.24 2–6 (25%) 3–4 (43%) 93.5 +0.26 2020 1644 121.9 -2.92 +1.95 0.947 48.8% -1 — — 42.9% -1.07 0–2 2–0 — -0.11
31 2025 1680 133.0 -0.52 +0.63 0.991 49.7% +20 — -97 43.9% -0.34 3–4 (43%) 2–2 (50%) 100.7 -0.13 2021 1645 119.5 -3.17 +0.46 0.907 47.7% +15 -91 +14 34.8% -1.00 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.62
32 2026 1644 106.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1631 135.0 -3.81 +1.21 0.902 47.6% +61 -46 -100 42.6% -0.72 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.1 -0.90
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1583 118.6 -4.39 -0.51 0.886 47.1% +13 +7 -81 34.9% -1.26 0–5 (0%) 4–4 (50%) 95.1 -0.79
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1572 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1521 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1805 129.3 -0.73 -0.31 0.955 49.0% +14 -323 -88 45.8% -0.37 25–37 (40%) 28–26 (52%) 98.2 +0.70 — 1723 129.4 -2.95 +0.67 0.906 47.8% +6 -59 -14 40.6% -0.76 27–45 (38%) 25–22 (53%) 98.9 -2.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.