H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Lin Zhu vs Magda Linette H2H: 2-1
Lin Zhu holds a 2–1 lead over Magda Linette in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Magda Linette leads 1–0 on clay, while Lin Zhu leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Magda Linette won the 2024 Rome first round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
POL
Age 34
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2024* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R128 | Clay | Magda Linette | 6-3 6-2 | Lin Zhu | Match data |
| Jun 23, 2023* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Lin Zhu | 6-3 6-0 | Magda Linette | Match data |
| Feb 2, 2017* | Taipei | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Lin Zhu | 6-3 5-7 6-4 | Magda Linette | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lin Zhu | #130 | #31 | 1,464 | 1,805 | 92 | 115 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Magda Linette | #51 | #19 | 1,921 | 1,863 | 219 | 227 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lin Zhu | Magda Linette | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #134 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #176 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #124 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #90 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #113 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #120 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #72 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #81 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #91 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #43 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 |
| 2022 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #84 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 |
| 2023 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #37 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #48 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 |
| 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #24 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 |
| 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #168 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #38 | 1,827 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #54 | 1,742 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #51 | 1,799 | 0 | 4 |