H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Lin Zhu vs Rebecca Marino H2H: 3-1
Lin Zhu holds a 3–1 lead over Rebecca Marino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Lin Zhu leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Rebecca Marino leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lin Zhu won the 2023 Birmingham quarterfinal 4-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2023* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Lin Zhu | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Rebecca Marino | Match data |
| Apr 27, 2023* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R128 | Clay | Rebecca Marino | 7-6(1) 6-4 | Lin Zhu | Match data |
| Mar 3, 2023* | Monterrey | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Lin Zhu | 7-6(4) 2-6 6-3 | Rebecca Marino | Match data |
| Jan 18, 2023* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Lin Zhu | 6-2 6-4 | Rebecca Marino | Match data |
| Mar 22, 2022 | Miami | WTA 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Rebecca Marino | 6-3 6-2 | Lin Zhu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lin Zhu | #130 | #31 | 1,464 | 1,805 | 92 | 115 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Rebecca Marino | #361 | #38 | 1,322 | 1,726 | 48 | 77 | 38.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lin Zhu | Rebecca Marino | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #134 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #356 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #176 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #178 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #124 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #104 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #113 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #64 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #120 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #91 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #215 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #145 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #84 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #63 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #37 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #176 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #102 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #168 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 | 2025 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #178 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |