H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Lin Zhu vs Roberta Vinci H2H: 1-0
Lin Zhu holds a 1–0 lead over Roberta Vinci in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lin Zhu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lin Zhu won the 2014 Guangzhou third round 6-3 7-6(7).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 43
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2014* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Lin Zhu | 6-3 7-6(7) | Roberta Vinci | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lin Zhu | #130 | #31 | 1,464 | 1,805 | 92 | 115 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Roberta Vinci | #193 | #7 | 3,615 | 1,923 | 320 | 287 | 52.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lin Zhu | Roberta Vinci | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #134 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #176 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #184 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #124 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #119 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #113 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #116 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #120 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #41 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #85 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #91 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #73 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #84 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 |
| 2022 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #84 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,663 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #37 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #38 | 1,817 | 0 | 3 |
| 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #23 | 1,774 | 0 | 6 |
| 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #168 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #16 | 1,834 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,853 | 0 | 9 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #47 | 1,712 | 0 | 9 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #15 | 1,765 | 0 | 9 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #18 | 1,733 | 0 | 10 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #116 | 1,610 | 0 | 10 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #193 | 1,628 | 0 | 10 |