H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 22:32 UTC
Lin Zhu vs Samantha Stosur H2H: 1-0
Lin Zhu holds a 1–0 lead over Samantha Stosur in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lin Zhu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lin Zhu won the 2022 Melbourne 2 third round 7-6(5) 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 42
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2022* | Melbourne 2 | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Lin Zhu | 7-6(5) 7-6(5) | Samantha Stosur | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lin Zhu | #130 | #31 | 1,464 | 1,805 | 92 | 115 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Samantha Stosur | #531 | #4 | 6,195 | 2,068 | 451 | 335 | 57.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lin Zhu | Samantha Stosur | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #134 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #176 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #163 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #124 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #65 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #113 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #46 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #120 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #29 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #91 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #52 | 1,746 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #13 | 1,885 | 0 | 1 |
| 2022 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #84 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #6 | 1,927 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #37 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #6 | 1,977 | 1 | 3 |
| 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #9 | 1,883 | 1 | 3 |
| 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #168 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #18 | 1,902 | 1 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #22 | 1,883 | 1 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #27 | 1,789 | 1 | 8 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #21 | 1,716 | 1 | 8 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #41 | 1,734 | 1 | 9 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #74 | 1,663 | 1 | 9 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #99 | 1,631 | 1 | 9 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #112 | 1,607 | 1 | 9 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #382 | 1,522 | 1 | 9 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #529 | 1,511 | 1 | 9 |