H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:17 UTC
Liudmila Samsonova vs Jil Teichmann H2H: 0-2
Jil Teichmann holds a 2–0 lead over Liudmila Samsonova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jil Teichmann leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Jil Teichmann won the 2026 Roland Garros first round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 27
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 29
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2026 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Jil Teichmann | 6-4 6-4 | Liudmila Samsonova | Match data |
| Jul 27, 2019* | Palermo | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Jil Teichmann | 6-3 6-1 | Liudmila Samsonova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liudmila Samsonova | #69 | #12 | 2,950 | 1,971 | 161 | 133 | 54.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Jil Teichmann | #119 | #21 | 2,101 | 1,876 | 98 | 107 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Liudmila Samsonova | Jil Teichmann | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2019 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #129 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2020 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #127 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #69 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2021 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2022 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #20 | 1,915 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #37 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2023 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #16 | 1,934 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #35 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2024 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #27 | 1,856 | 0 | 5 | 2023 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #147 | 1,613 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2025 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #17 | 1,856 | 0 | 5 | 2024 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2026 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #69 | 1,758 | 0 | 5 | 2025 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #123 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #119 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 |