H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Maddison Inglis vs Qiang Wang H2H: 0-1

Qiang Wang holds a 1–0 lead over Maddison Inglis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Qiang Wang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Qiang Wang won the 2021 Phillip Island Trophy second round 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Maddison Inglis
Australia Age 28 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Qiang Wang
China Age 34 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Qiang Wang #34 6-4 6-2 Maddison Inglis #133 Match data Feb 16, 2021* R32 Phillip Island Trophy WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Maddison Inglis #134 #112 654 1,674 10 25 28.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Qiang Wang #421 #12 2,946 1,931 129 127 50.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Maddison Inglis Qiang Wang
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2016 0–2 0.0% #551 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — 2012 0–3 0.0% #185 1,458 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2013 1–1 50.0% #226 1,474 0 0
22 2020 0–2 0.0% #130 1,444 0 0 2014 1–2 33.3% #102 1,467 0 0
23 2021 4–8 33.3% #141 1,473 0 0 2015 4–14 22.2% #110 1,448 0 0
24 2022 3–5 37.5% #180 1,484 0 0 2016 9–12 42.9% #72 1,538 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2017 24–19 55.8% #45 1,720 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2018 37–21 63.8% #21 1,906 0 2
27 2025 0–6 0.0% #164 1,581 0 0 2019 23–18 56.1% #30 1,792 0 2
28 2026 3–2 60.0% #134 1,627 0 0 2020 7–6 53.8% #34 1,765 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2021 10–14 41.7% #104 1,713 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2022 13–13 50.0% #91 1,717 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2024 0–4 0.0% #376 1,623 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Maddison Inglis Qiang Wang
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2016 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2020 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
23 2021 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 2022 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 18 13 31 58.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 32 15 47 68.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2025 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2019 16 10 26 61.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 2026 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2020 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 4 9 13 30.8% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 9 19 28 32.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — 103 89 192 53.6% 21 27 48 43.8% 5 11 16 31.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 32/35 of Maddison Inglis's and 239/257 of Qiang Wang's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Maddison Inglis Qiang Wang
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2016 2/2 1.0 2.5 54.9% 46.5% 36.8% 29.2% 37.5% 42.0% 34.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 3/3 0.0 2.3 63.7% 51.1% 37.0% 33.2% 54.2% 46.3% 37.9%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 1/2 2.0 1.0 69.4% 59.3% 57.7% 37.5% 26.3% 58.8% 47.6%
22 2020 2/2 0.5 3.0 71.5% 51.6% 41.5% 45.8% 52.5% 48.6% 39.3% 2014 2/3 4.0 1.0 56.4% 70.6% 54.4% 81.8% 42.4% 62.7% 49.1%
23 2021 12/12 2.0 2.8 62.7% 59.4% 45.8% 48.3% 28.1% 54.2% 39.6% 2015 10/18 2.5 3.0 64.1% 59.0% 45.4% 48.0% 33.2% 53.6% 37.0%
24 2022 8/8 2.6 3.6 66.2% 60.4% 40.2% 48.3% 61.8% 54.1% 42.3% 2016 18/22 2.2 2.9 63.0% 62.4% 44.4% 53.3% 46.6% 55.9% 41.6%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 43/43 2.7 1.8 63.1% 63.9% 50.5% 55.7% 49.0% 58.9% 46.3%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 57/58 2.6 1.7 62.4% 65.2% 48.8% 52.5% 49.8% 59.1% 47.4%
27 2025 4/6 2.3 4.0 59.3% 53.7% 47.4% 40.7% 25.8% 51.4% 36.5% 2019 40/41 2.4 2.1 61.7% 63.9% 49.5% 56.1% 52.1% 58.0% 43.6%
28 2026 4/5 1.8 2.0 63.5% 60.8% 47.0% 40.1% 52.4% 55.8% 36.9% 2020 13/13 1.3 1.8 60.2% 63.2% 53.7% 51.1% 44.2% 59.4% 43.6%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 22/24 3.5 3.6 58.5% 60.7% 44.5% 53.9% 39.5% 53.9% 43.9%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 26/26 2.1 1.7 63.8% 61.7% 47.7% 53.8% 50.2% 56.6% 42.6%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 4/4 1.0 2.5 61.2% 54.3% 27.9% 38.6% 51.4% 45.2% 36.5%
Career — 32/35 2.0 3.0 63.3% 57.8% 43.9% 45.0% 41.4% 52.9% 39.2% — 239/257 2.4 2.1 62.2% 63.0% 48.1% 53.5% 47.8% 57.3% 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Maddison Inglis Qiang Wang
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2016 1484 102.2 -2.40 -1.06 0.587 38.5% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1459 93.4 -2.59 -4.30 0.705 42.2% +20 — — 14.3% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.34
21 2019 1477 102.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1474 106.8 +1.03 +1.18 1.155 52.7% — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — -0.12
22 2020 1445 97.5 -1.27 +0.38 0.766 44.5% — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 — — -0.11 2014 1468 102.3 -0.40 -0.04 1.315 56.2% +13 — — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.36
23 2021 1474 111.4 -2.32 -2.08 0.865 46.8% +4 — — 33.3% -1.44 2–1 (67%) — — +0.33 2015 1449 112.8 -2.12 -2.78 0.797 45.2% +43 — — 31.8% -1.18 2–6 (25%) 1–1 — +0.30
24 2022 1485 99.8 -2.83 -0.47 0.921 48.4% +26 — — 42.9% -1.10 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — +0.75 2016 1539 124.4 +0.50 0.00 0.943 48.8% +23 -27 — 43.5% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 1–0 — -0.52
25 2023 1475 90.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1721 140.3 +2.20 +2.13 1.126 52.2% +4 -118 — 57.4% +0.51 5–10 (33%) 5–4 (56%) 97.5 -0.59
26 2024 1455 100.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1906 152.9 +2.58 +4.18 1.157 53.0% +14 -273 — 61.1% +1.10 9–5 (64%) 1–3 (25%) 102.8 -1.43
27 2025 1582 115.3 -2.30 -1.96 0.751 43.7% -5 — — 14.3% -2.00 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.01 2019 1793 132.7 +1.42 +0.89 1.038 50.7% +55 -204 -179 55.6% +0.16 4–6 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.2 +1.10
28 2026 1628 113.3 +0.91 +0.33 0.836 46.3% +32 — — 45.5% -0.82 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.4 -0.15 2020 1766 129.1 +2.56 +1.23 1.073 51.4% +32 — — 53.3% +0.03 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 98.7 +0.36
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1714 121.2 -1.69 +0.38 0.952 48.9% -23 -55 — 44.1% -0.42 5–6 (45%) 3–1 (75%) 100.4 +0.25
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1717 128.6 +0.18 +0.03 0.981 49.6% +35 — -160 45.2% -0.11 8–2 (80%) 2–8 (20%) 101.7 -0.05
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1624 97.7 -3.97 -0.81 0.667 41.0% +19 — — 11.1% -3.00 0–1 — — -0.38
Career — 1674 109.6 -1.98 -1.14 0.832 46.1% +13 — — 31.7% -1.51 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.4 +2.00 — 1931 138.9 +1.10 +1.45 1.038 50.7% +22 -151 -171 50.5% +0.07 38–44 (46%) 22–21 (51%) 100.4 -0.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.