H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Madison Keys vs Lin Zhu H2H: 1-0
Madison Keys holds a 1–0 lead over Lin Zhu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Madison Keys leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Madison Keys won the 2019 US Open second round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 31
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2019* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Madison Keys | 6-4 6-1 | Lin Zhu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Madison Keys | #23 | #5 | 4,999 | 2,136 | 363 | 211 | 63.2% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 11 |
| Lin Zhu | #130 | #31 | 1,464 | 1,805 | 92 | 115 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Madison Keys | Lin Zhu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #616 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #134 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #273 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #176 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #137 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #124 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #38 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #113 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #120 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #18 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 41–16 | 71.9% | #8 | 1,915 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #91 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,899 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #84 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 27–13 | 67.5% | #13 | 1,910 | 0 | 5 | 2023 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #37 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #16 | 1,866 | 0 | 5 | 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #56 | 1,731 | 0 | 5 | 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #168 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #11 | 1,863 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #12 | 1,879 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 25–12 | 67.6% | #21 | 1,950 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 37–15 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,964 | 1 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #23 | 2,020 | 1 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |