H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Magda Linette vs Qiang Wang H2H: 1-3
Qiang Wang holds a 3–1 lead over Magda Linette in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Qiang Wang leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Qiang Wang won the 2022 Prague quarterfinal 7-5 6-7(5) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 34
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2022* | Prague | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Qiang Wang | 7-5 6-7(5) 6-4 | Magda Linette | Match data |
| Sep 15, 2018* | Hiroshima | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Qiang Wang | 6-2 6-2 | Magda Linette | Match data |
| Jul 28, 2018* | Nanchang | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Qiang Wang | 7-5 6-2 | Magda Linette | Match data |
| Mar 5, 2015* | Kuala Lumpur | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Magda Linette | 2-6 6-3 6-0 | Qiang Wang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magda Linette | #51 | #19 | 1,921 | 1,863 | 219 | 227 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,925 | 128 | 125 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Magda Linette | Qiang Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #90 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #72 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #81 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #43 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #48 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #24 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #38 | 1,827 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 |
| 2025 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #54 | 1,742 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #51 | 1,799 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |