H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Magdalena Frech vs Rebecca Marino H2H: 0-1
Rebecca Marino holds a 1–0 lead over Magdalena Frech in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rebecca Marino leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rebecca Marino won the 2022 US Open first round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 28
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2022* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Rebecca Marino | 6-2 6-3 | Magdalena Frech | Match data |
| Oct 5, 2021 | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Magdalena Frech | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | Rebecca Marino | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magdalena Frech | #44 | #22 | 2,020 | 1,874 | 86 | 131 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Rebecca Marino | #361 | #38 | 1,322 | 1,726 | 48 | 77 | 38.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magdalena Frech | Rebecca Marino | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #520 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #490 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #356 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #178 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #104 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #160 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #64 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2022 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #106 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2023 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #74 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2024 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #59 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #215 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2026 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #44 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #145 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #63 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #176 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #102 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #178 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |