H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Magdalena Frech vs Saisai Zheng H2H: 2-0
Magdalena Frech holds a 2–0 lead over Saisai Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Magdalena Frech leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Magdalena Frech won the 2021 Indian Wells first round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 28
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2021* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Magdalena Frech | 6-1 6-4 | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
| Jun 14, 2018* | Nottingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Magdalena Frech | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magdalena Frech | #44 | #22 | 2,020 | 1,874 | 86 | 131 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Saisai Zheng | #692 | #34 | 1,585 | 1,776 | 83 | 130 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Magdalena Frech | Saisai Zheng | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #520 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #490 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #160 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #72 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #85 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #106 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #38 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #74 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #42 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 |
| 2024 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 2025 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #59 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #79 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 2026 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #44 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #692 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |