H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:33 UTC
Maja Chwalinska vs Rebeka Masarova H2H: 2-0
Maja Chwalinska holds a 2–0 lead over Rebeka Masarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Maja Chwalinska leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Maja Chwalinska won the 2022 Iasi quarterfinal 6-3 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
POL
Age 24
Left-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 26
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2026 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Q3 | Hard | Maja Chwalinska | 7-6(8) 5-7 6-1 | Rebeka Masarova | Match data |
| Aug 5, 2022 | Iasi | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Maja Chwalinska | 6-3 4-6 6-2 | Rebeka Masarova | Match data |
| Jul 28, 2022* | Warsaw | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Maja Chwalinska | 7-5 6-2 | Rebeka Masarova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maja Chwalinska | #22 | #21 | 2,004 | 1,867 | 15 | 10 | 60.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rebeka Masarova | #166 | #62 | 982 | 1,799 | 37 | 46 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maja Chwalinska | Rebeka Masarova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #311 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2022 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #161 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #359 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #163 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2024 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #128 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #130 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #63 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2026 | 8–3 | 72.7% | #22 | 1,837 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #144 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #116 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #166 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |