H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Margarita Gasparyan vs Qiang Wang H2H: 0-1
Qiang Wang holds a 1–0 lead over Margarita Gasparyan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Qiang Wang leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Qiang Wang won the 2019 Prague third round 6-3 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 31
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2019* | Prague | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Qiang Wang | 6-3 3-6 6-2 | Margarita Gasparyan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Margarita Gasparyan | #1,358 | #41 | 1,213 | 1,773 | 50 | 57 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,925 | 128 | 125 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Margarita Gasparyan | Qiang Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #61 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #117 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #92 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #104 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #125 | 1,606 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,606 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1358 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 |