H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Maria Sakkari vs Qiang Wang H2H: 0-3
Qiang Wang holds a 3–0 lead over Maria Sakkari in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Qiang Wang leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Qiang Wang won the 2018 Wuhan second round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GRE
Age 30
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2018* | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Qiang Wang | 7-5 6-2 | Maria Sakkari | Match data |
| May 3, 2017* | Prague | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Qiang Wang | 6-1 4-6 6-2 | Maria Sakkari | Match data |
| Sep 2, 2015* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Qiang Wang | 7-5 6-2 | Maria Sakkari | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Sakkari | #37 | #3 | 5,085 | 2,033 | 258 | 205 | 55.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,925 | 128 | 125 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Maria Sakkari | Qiang Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #98 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #41 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #23 | 1,800 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 20–11 | 64.5% | #22 | 1,881 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #6 | 1,952 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #6 | 1,917 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #9 | 1,882 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 2024 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #32 | 1,844 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 2025 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #52 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 2026 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #37 | 1,812 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 |