H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Marta Kostyuk vs Saisai Zheng H2H: 2-0
Marta Kostyuk holds a 2–0 lead over Saisai Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marta Kostyuk leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Marta Kostyuk won the 2021 Roland Garros second round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 24
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2021* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Marta Kostyuk | 6-3 6-4 | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
| May 23, 2019* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Marta Kostyuk | 6-3 6-1 | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marta Kostyuk | #11 | #11 | 3,926 | 2,110 | 150 | 113 | 57.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Saisai Zheng | #692 | #34 | 1,585 | 1,776 | 83 | 130 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Marta Kostyuk | Saisai Zheng | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #119 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #153 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #99 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #50 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #69 | 1,742 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #72 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #39 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #85 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #18 | 1,901 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #26 | 1,892 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #38 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026 | 27–6 | 81.8% | #11 | 2,090 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #42 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #79 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #692 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |