H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Marta Kostyuk vs Shelby Rogers H2H: 1-0

Marta Kostyuk holds a 1–0 lead over Shelby Rogers in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marta Kostyuk leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marta Kostyuk won the 2022 Adelaide 2 first round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Marta Kostyuk
Ukraine Age 24 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Shelby Rogers
United States Age 33 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Shelby Rogers #47 6-3 6-3 Marta Kostyuk #69 Match data Jan 7, 2023 Q1 Q Adelaide 2 WTA 500 Hard
Marta Kostyuk #50 6-3 6-4 Shelby Rogers #36 Match data Jan 12, 2022* R32 Adelaide 2 WTA 250 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Marta Kostyuk #11 #11 3,980 2,109 161 117 57.9% 0 1 0 0 2 3
Shelby Rogers #437 #30 1,698 1,855 126 140 47.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Marta Kostyuk Shelby Rogers
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2018 3–5 37.5% #119 1,515 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2019 2–3 40.0% #153 1,615 0 0 2010 0–1 0.0% #352 1,494 0 0
18 2020 2–5 28.6% #99 1,661 0 0 2011 0–1 0.0% #426 1,479 0 0
19 2021 19–16 54.3% #50 1,739 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2022 16–20 44.4% #69 1,754 0 0 2013 2–3 40.0% #126 1,478 0 0
21 2023 23–20 53.5% #39 1,810 0 1 2014 12–9 57.1% #72 1,630 0 0
22 2024 36–20 64.3% #18 1,889 0 1 2015 4–14 22.2% #151 1,527 0 0
23 2025 25–19 56.8% #26 1,890 0 1 2016 13–15 46.4% #59 1,585 0 0
24 2026 35–9 79.5% #11 2,082 0 3 2017 23–19 54.8% #59 1,689 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2018 0–2 0.0% #630 1,650 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2019 3–9 25.0% #177 1,574 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2020 8–6 57.1% #60 1,679 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2021 28–21 57.1% #40 1,804 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2022 20–19 51.3% #47 1,804 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2023 9–13 40.9% #149 1,773 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2024 4–8 33.3% #341 1,675 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Marta Kostyuk Shelby Rogers
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2018 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2019 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2020 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2011 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2021 11 10 21 52.4% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2022 12 14 26 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
21 2023 20 15 35 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2014 8 6 14 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
22 2024 26 12 38 68.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2015 2 8 10 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2025 19 13 32 59.4% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 2016 5 10 15 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2026 14 7 21 66.7% 16 1 17 94.1% 5 1 6 83.3% 2017 13 12 25 52.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 20 12 32 62.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 14 11 25 56.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 6 7 13 46.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
Career — 106 77 183 57.9% 41 25 66 62.1% 14 15 29 48.3% — 77 82 159 48.4% 38 40 78 48.7% 11 18 29 37.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 261/278 of Marta Kostyuk's and 252/266 of Shelby Rogers's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Marta Kostyuk Shelby Rogers
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2018 8/8 4.8 6.9 54.1% 68.7% 45.4% 47.7% 63.8% 57.4% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2019 5/5 2.6 3.6 60.9% 63.8% 47.8% 48.7% 44.7% 57.2% 45.0% 2010 1/1 2.0 9.0 49.2% 68.9% 41.3% 60.0% 60.0% 54.8% 35.5%
18 2020 7/7 3.6 5.3 62.0% 64.8% 43.4% 60.9% 35.8% 56.2% 42.0% 2011 1/1 3.0 4.0 51.7% 54.8% 51.7% 37.5% 22.2% 53.3% 36.7%
19 2021 35/35 2.7 3.9 62.7% 61.9% 45.2% 51.6% 45.5% 55.6% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2022 35/36 3.4 5.3 60.8% 64.4% 41.0% 48.5% 40.3% 55.5% 42.6% 2013 3/5 4.0 1.3 62.8% 67.6% 53.3% 59.4% 27.8% 62.3% 34.2%
21 2023 43/43 3.1 6.0 57.0% 66.3% 43.4% 48.0% 49.1% 56.5% 43.6% 2014 20/21 3.3 3.5 59.4% 66.1% 43.5% 47.9% 39.3% 57.1% 42.8%
22 2024 50/56 3.0 6.8 57.2% 65.8% 44.1% 52.9% 53.3% 56.6% 44.8% 2015 13/18 1.8 4.1 61.1% 58.1% 48.5% 48.5% 41.6% 54.1% 35.9%
23 2025 34/44 3.0 5.8 59.5% 67.7% 46.0% 62.0% 49.1% 58.9% 45.1% 2016 25/28 3.5 3.0 59.2% 65.0% 50.8% 53.1% 54.6% 59.3% 43.0%
24 2026 44/44 4.0 4.2 57.7% 71.2% 48.0% 59.4% 53.3% 61.4% 48.1% 2017 40/42 3.4 2.5 61.9% 65.3% 49.1% 54.4% 51.6% 59.1% 41.4%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 2/2 5.0 5.0 57.9% 60.1% 48.5% 36.8% 57.7% 55.1% 40.1%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 12/12 4.9 3.4 58.6% 62.2% 47.5% 50.8% 52.1% 56.2% 43.6%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 14/14 4.2 2.6 60.1% 67.3% 48.7% 55.8% 53.6% 59.4% 39.3%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 49/49 4.0 2.4 62.3% 67.1% 50.2% 54.5% 49.2% 60.6% 43.8%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 38/39 4.3 3.0 60.1% 67.1% 49.9% 58.3% 49.5% 60.2% 40.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 22/22 3.7 2.9 60.1% 68.2% 45.8% 55.2% 50.0% 59.0% 39.0%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 12/12 2.2 2.3 58.0% 64.8% 47.7% 51.0% 41.6% 57.3% 40.4%
Career — 261/278 3.2 5.4 58.9% 66.4% 44.7% 53.6% 49.0% 57.4% 44.6% — 252/266 3.7 2.9 60.5% 65.7% 48.7% 53.7% 48.8% 58.9% 41.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Marta Kostyuk Shelby Rogers
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2017 1483 97.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2018 1516 118.6 -0.89 -0.21 0.947 49.5% -2 +68 — 44.4% -0.33 0–2 — — +0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2019 1616 118.9 -1.57 +1.09 1.053 50.9% — +68 — 53.8% +0.23 0–3 (0%) — — -0.05 2010 1494 105.0 +0.17 +0.58 0.785 45.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.10
18 2020 1661 127.8 -0.40 -0.50 0.959 49.2% -2 — — 37.5% -0.88 0–2 2–1 (67%) — -0.16 2011 1479 95.8 -4.03 -4.58 0.787 43.9% — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.08
19 2021 1740 135.9 -0.54 +0.60 0.990 49.9% -34 +9 -154 53.2% +0.27 4–5 (44%) 3–5 (38%) 98.1 -0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2022 1754 134.9 -0.66 +0.17 0.957 49.2% +1 -64 -136 46.5% -0.19 8–8 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 99.5 -1.22 2013 1478 105.2 +0.56 -2.93 0.907 49.1% — +62 — 50.0% +0.17 0–2 — — +0.53
21 2023 1811 147.6 +0.01 +1.37 1.002 50.2% +7 -145 -163 51.0% +0.05 10–8 (56%) 9–5 (64%) 103.7 -1.77 2014 1631 132.2 +1.08 -0.03 0.997 49.8% -30 -7 — 53.2% +0.15 4–1 (80%) 4–3 (57%) 105.7 -0.57
22 2024 1890 152.6 +0.62 +2.38 1.033 50.9% +29 -120 -214 57.5% +0.47 16–5 (76%) 11–6 (65%) 113.1 -0.25 2015 1528 107.8 -2.17 -3.76 0.783 44.7% +11 +55 — 28.2% -1.67 0–3 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 92.8 -0.14
23 2025 1890 156.7 +2.03 +2.05 1.097 51.9% +45 -52 -342 55.2% +0.57 9–8 (53%) 3–8 (27%) 96.3 +1.49 2016 1585 127.2 +2.25 +0.12 1.057 51.1% -39 +110 — 49.3% +0.09 5–8 (38%) 4–4 (50%) 97.4 +0.44
24 2026 2082 166.2 +4.43 +5.66 1.244 54.7% -66 +25 -302 72.3% +1.78 10–3 (77%) 4–6 (40%) 105.0 -2.33 2017 1689 133.0 +2.26 -1.35 1.011 50.1% -50 +54 -96 52.0% +0.14 10–8 (56%) 10–4 (71%) 108.3 -1.20
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1650 103.6 -2.39 -1.26 0.893 47.6% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–2 0–2 — +0.21
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1574 111.3 -0.80 -0.46 0.996 50.1% — +121 +52 44.8% -0.31 0–7 (0%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.20
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1680 132.2 +1.94 -0.55 0.967 49.3% +16 — — 51.5% -0.12 4–1 (80%) 3–2 (60%) 106.2 +0.47
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1805 147.1 +3.43 +1.34 1.111 52.0% +24 -149 -144 57.1% +0.48 6–10 (38%) 8–6 (57%) 96.6 -0.42
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1804 144.1 +2.94 -1.21 1.009 50.3% +44 -170 -145 52.2% -0.08 6–10 (38%) 7–2 (78%) 99.2 -1.95
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1773 137.9 +1.67 -1.25 0.951 49.1% +77 -140 — 42.6% -0.41 5–7 (42%) 0–6 (0%) 92.1 -1.29
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1676 122.2 -0.04 -0.79 0.948 48.6% +36 -21 — 32.0% -1.00 1–0 0–1 — -0.39
Career — 2110 153.3 +0.90 +2.01 1.047 51.1% +4 -30 -215 55.5% +0.45 57–44 (56%) 37–35 (51%) 104.8 -1.59 — 1856 140.0 +1.85 -0.58 1.004 50.0% +8 -8 -100 48.9% -0.10 41–61 (40%) 39–36 (52%) 94.4 -1.71

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.