H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Nao Hibino vs Alexandra Cadantu-Ignatik H2H: 0-2
Alexandra Cadantu-Ignatik holds a 2–0 lead over Nao Hibino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Alexandra Cadantu-Ignatik leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Alexandra Cadantu-Ignatik won the 2022 Hamburg third round 6-3 2-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ROU
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2022* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Alexandra Cadantu-Ignatik | 6-3 2-6 6-2 | Nao Hibino | Match data |
| Apr 27, 2017* | Istanbul | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Alexandra Cadantu-Ignatik | 2-6 6-0 6-3 | Nao Hibino | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nao Hibino | #235 | #56 | 1,050 | 1,726 | 79 | 118 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Alexandra Cadantu-Ignatik | #1,168 | #59 | 972 | 1,601 | 37 | 64 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Nao Hibino | Alexandra Cadantu-Ignatik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2015 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #66 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #94 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #90 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #97 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #61 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #114 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 3–17 | 15.0% | #236 | 1,420 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #106 | 1,614 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #157 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #73 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #129 | 1,538 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #269 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #208 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #178 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #145 | 1,603 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #174 | 1,514 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,533 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |