H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Naomi Osaka vs Katerina Siniakova H2H: 2-1
Naomi Osaka holds a 2–1 lead over Katerina Siniakova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Katerina Siniakova leads 1–0 on clay, while Naomi Osaka leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Naomi Osaka won the 2025 Wimbledon second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 28
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 30
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2025 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Naomi Osaka | 6-3 6-2 | Katerina Siniakova | Match data |
| Jun 1, 2019* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Katerina Siniakova | 6-4 6-2 | Naomi Osaka | Match data |
| Feb 14, 2018* | Doha | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Naomi Osaka | 6-4 6-0 | Katerina Siniakova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naomi Osaka | #13 | #1 | 7,985 | 2,140 | 240 | 130 | 64.9% | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 |
| Katerina Siniakova | #34 | #27 | 1,718 | 1,894 | 227 | 241 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Naomi Osaka | Katerina Siniakova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2016 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #68 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #102 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #5 | 1,904 | 1 | 2 | 2016 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 40–13 | 75.5% | #3 | 2,030 | 2 | 5 | 2017 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2020 | 16–3 | 84.2% | #3 | 2,082 | 3 | 6 | 2018 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #31 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2021 | 18–7 | 72.0% | #13 | 2,002 | 4 | 7 | 2019 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #58 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2022 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #42 | 1,894 | 4 | 7 | 2020 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #59 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #49 | 1,802 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2024 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #57 | 1,883 | 4 | 7 | 2022 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #49 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2025 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #16 | 1,968 | 4 | 8 | 2023 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #45 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2026 | 19–8 | 70.4% | #13 | 2,044 | 4 | 8 | 2024 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #45 | 1,809 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #48 | 1,884 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #34 | 1,833 | 0 | 5 |