H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Naomi Osaka vs Kristina Kucova H2H: 2-0
Naomi Osaka holds a 2–0 lead over Kristina Kucova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Naomi Osaka leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Naomi Osaka won the 2018 Australian Open first round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 28
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 36
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2018* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Naomi Osaka | 7-5 6-2 | Kristina Kucova | Match data |
| Mar 23, 2017* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Naomi Osaka | 6-2 6-3 | Kristina Kucova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naomi Osaka | #13 | #1 | 7,985 | 2,140 | 240 | 130 | 64.9% | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 |
| Kristina Kucova | #1,375 | #71 | 899 | 1,696 | 40 | 68 | 37.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Naomi Osaka | Kristina Kucova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2014 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #68 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #112 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #5 | 1,904 | 1 | 2 | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #228 | 1,446 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 40–13 | 75.5% | #3 | 2,030 | 2 | 5 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 16–3 | 84.2% | #3 | 2,082 | 3 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2021 | 18–7 | 72.0% | #13 | 2,002 | 4 | 7 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #147 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #42 | 1,894 | 4 | 7 | 2014 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #147 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #146 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #57 | 1,883 | 4 | 7 | 2016 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #81 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #16 | 1,968 | 4 | 8 | 2017 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #245 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2026 | 19–8 | 70.4% | #13 | 2,044 | 4 | 8 | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #259 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #175 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #147 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #97 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #268 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #507 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |