H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Naomi Osaka vs Saisai Zheng H2H: 2-0

Naomi Osaka holds a 2–0 lead over Saisai Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Naomi Osaka leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Naomi Osaka won the 2021 Tokyo Olympics first round 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Naomi Osaka
Japan Age 28 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Saisai Zheng
China Age 32 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Naomi Osaka #2 6-1 6-4 Saisai Zheng #52 Match data Jul 26, 2021* R64 Tokyo Olympics Olympics Hard
Naomi Osaka #4 6-2 6-4 Saisai Zheng #42 Match data Jan 23, 2020* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Naomi Osaka #92 6-4 7-6(3) Saisai Zheng #64 Match data Apr 29, 2016 Q1 Q Madrid Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Naomi Osaka #13 #1 7,985 2,179 250 137 64.6% 4 2 0 1 0 7
Saisai Zheng #692 #34 1,585 1,776 87 133 39.5% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Naomi Osaka Saisai Zheng
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2014 2–2 50.0% #260 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2015 0–2 0.0% #144 1,508 0 0 2011 0–2 0.0% #276 1,473 0 0
18 2016 20–13 60.6% #48 1,700 0 0 2012 2–3 40.0% #138 1,483 0 0
19 2017 19–22 46.3% #68 1,695 0 0 2013 1–3 25.0% #145 1,467 0 0
20 2018 40–20 66.7% #5 1,902 1 2 2014 6–6 50.0% #100 1,552 0 0
21 2019 40–13 75.5% #3 2,047 2 5 2015 9–22 29.0% #72 1,495 0 0
22 2020 16–3 84.2% #3 2,111 3 6 2016 13–24 35.1% #85 1,542 0 0
23 2021 20–8 71.4% #13 2,040 4 7 2017 5–10 33.3% #93 1,618 0 0
24 2022 15–11 57.7% #42 1,933 4 7 2018 13–12 52.0% #38 1,678 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2019 21–23 47.7% #42 1,750 0 1
26 2024 21–17 55.3% #57 1,872 4 7 2020 6–4 60.0% #41 1,768 0 1
27 2025 30–15 66.7% #16 1,959 4 7 2021 10–17 37.0% #79 1,686 0 1
28 2026 27–11 71.1% #13 2,051 4 7 — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — 2024 1–5 16.7% #692 1,548 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2025 0–2 0.0% — 1,491 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Naomi Osaka Saisai Zheng
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2014 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2016 18 11 29 62.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2012 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2017 13 13 26 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0% 2013 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2018 29 13 42 69.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 2014 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2019 30 7 37 81.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 2015 8 17 25 32.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 2020 16 3 19 84.2% — — — — — — — — 2016 10 17 27 37.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
23 2021 18 5 23 78.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2017 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2022 14 9 23 60.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2018 12 7 19 63.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 18 16 34 52.9% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0%
26 2024 13 9 22 59.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2020 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2025 24 9 33 72.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2021 7 13 20 35.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
28 2026 12 6 18 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 189 89 278 68.0% 36 31 67 53.7% 25 17 42 59.5% — 75 100 175 42.9% 8 20 28 28.6% 4 13 17 23.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 350/386 of Naomi Osaka's and 195/218 of Saisai Zheng's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Naomi Osaka Saisai Zheng
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2014 4/4 4.3 1.8 55.4% 65.3% 44.8% 33.6% 49.2% 55.5% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 2/2 0.0 0.5 57.0% 46.2% 38.1% 48.6% 17.7% 43.0% 38.5%
18 2016 33/33 4.8 2.5 55.2% 69.6% 48.3% 54.8% 51.5% 59.9% 43.8% 2012 5/5 0.8 1.2 59.6% 59.8% 41.1% 51.6% 46.4% 52.1% 43.1%
19 2017 40/41 4.2 2.5 55.9% 67.2% 45.7% 45.6% 46.3% 57.5% 40.2% 2013 4/4 1.8 3.8 63.2% 56.7% 39.1% 50.4% 42.0% 50.4% 45.6%
20 2018 55/60 4.7 2.1 59.7% 71.1% 48.8% 55.8% 55.7% 61.9% 45.3% 2014 8/12 1.6 1.4 66.9% 56.0% 51.5% 45.6% 52.8% 54.4% 45.8%
21 2019 50/53 7.0 1.9 60.2% 73.1% 47.9% 56.3% 51.0% 63.1% 44.4% 2015 20/31 0.9 2.2 66.6% 52.7% 45.0% 41.5% 52.4% 50.4% 40.2%
22 2020 18/19 7.8 2.5 59.0% 76.0% 53.0% 64.2% 43.2% 66.5% 42.5% 2016 34/37 0.9 2.1 63.7% 56.5% 46.6% 51.9% 45.9% 52.5% 44.2%
23 2021 21/28 6.5 2.8 53.5% 76.2% 52.2% 59.4% 52.6% 64.9% 43.6% 2017 15/15 1.2 2.2 65.3% 54.2% 43.1% 51.6% 58.7% 49.8% 38.9%
24 2022 22/26 5.7 2.5 51.4% 76.9% 47.4% 61.9% 44.1% 62.7% 41.4% 2018 21/25 0.9 2.0 66.8% 58.5% 45.1% 54.0% 49.2% 54.0% 45.2%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 44/44 1.4 2.7 64.7% 59.2% 44.3% 49.7% 45.7% 53.7% 43.6%
26 2024 36/38 6.5 2.7 54.0% 75.1% 51.1% 56.3% 50.1% 64.0% 40.4% 2020 10/10 1.3 2.0 70.3% 62.9% 43.1% 43.5% 45.9% 57.5% 46.4%
27 2025 34/46 6.6 2.9 56.9% 74.7% 49.3% 52.5% 53.6% 63.5% 45.2% 2021 26/27 0.9 1.8 67.3% 58.4% 47.9% 53.1% 43.0% 54.9% 42.5%
28 2026 37/38 5.9 2.5 58.2% 72.9% 49.6% 52.0% 47.3% 63.2% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 6/6 1.0 3.3 62.2% 51.9% 44.6% 40.1% 45.4% 49.1% 39.6%
Career — 350/388 5.8 2.4 56.9% 72.6% 48.9% 54.7% 50.3% 62.3% 43.1% — 195/220 1.1 2.2 65.4% 57.2% 45.2% 49.6% 47.4% 52.9% 43.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Naomi Osaka Saisai Zheng
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2014 1531 113.5 +0.17 +0.57 0.923 48.4% +17 — — 45.5% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2015 1509 102.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — 0.00 2011 1474 95.9 -1.89 -2.23 0.676 41.1% — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — +0.25
18 2016 1700 128.3 +3.18 +0.66 1.091 51.9% -10 -101 — 60.0% +0.65 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) 101.0 +0.04 2012 1483 99.4 -0.72 -1.45 0.900 48.2% +11 — — 33.3% -1.55 0–1 1–0 — +0.37
19 2017 1696 132.1 +1.30 -2.12 0.947 48.9% +6 -84 -47 45.8% -0.18 5–4 (56%) 2–5 (29%) 97.8 -1.51 2013 1468 100.9 -1.08 +0.55 0.920 48.0% +5 — — 30.0% -1.00 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.17
20 2018 1902 160.7 +5.21 +2.94 1.190 53.8% +17 -236 -168 67.5% +1.35 4–3 (57%) 4–4 (50%) 99.8 -2.09 2014 1553 119.6 -1.26 +0.86 1.006 49.7% +9 — — 53.3% -0.23 2–4 (33%) 1–1 — -0.37
21 2019 2047 154.9 +5.80 +1.63 1.202 53.6% +30 -229 -350 68.4% +1.22 17–2 (89%) 10–4 (71%) 116.1 +0.60 2015 1496 110.7 -5.38 -1.24 0.811 45.6% +9 +30 +74 30.9% -1.50 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 105.2 -0.08
22 2020 2112 156.0 +6.66 +1.24 1.267 54.0% +19 — — 71.7% +1.61 9–1 (90%) 3–5 (38%) 103.1 -0.42 2016 1542 123.0 -2.10 +1.09 0.930 48.2% +24 -74 +9 40.0% -0.83 0–8 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 91.8 +0.81
23 2021 2040 154.1 +6.00 +1.08 1.240 54.0% +82 -235 — 72.2% +1.43 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 95.5 -0.04 2017 1619 110.1 -3.22 -1.56 0.775 44.5% -8 -100 — 34.2% -1.42 5–3 (63%) 3–1 (75%) 104.9 -0.08
24 2022 1934 147.8 +4.77 +0.02 1.112 52.0% +91 -156 — 57.4% +0.81 4–1 (80%) 0–2 — -0.62 2018 1679 118.9 -1.21 +1.53 0.983 49.6% +22 -169 -79 54.5% +0.13 3–4 (43%) 0–1 — +1.42
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1750 134.4 -2.18 +0.80 0.942 48.7% -10 -123 -200 48.0% -0.28 8–6 (57%) 11–3 (79%) 107.3 +0.31
26 2024 1873 146.8 +5.89 -1.17 1.122 52.2% +76 -98 -157 56.3% +0.71 3–5 (38%) 4–8 (33%) 94.1 -2.05 2020 1768 132.2 +0.85 +2.96 1.090 51.7% -8 — — 58.3% +0.58 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.03
27 2025 1960 153.1 +4.79 +1.97 1.240 54.1% +52 -122 -247 65.1% +1.10 11–9 (55%) 10–6 (63%) 102.1 +0.96 2021 1686 121.1 -1.18 -0.16 0.941 48.6% -18 -68 — 38.7% -0.89 4–4 (50%) 1–1 — -0.36
28 2026 2051 158.1 +5.15 +1.24 1.160 53.0% -3 -102 -109 66.7% +1.12 8–2 (80%) 7–3 (70%) 109.2 -0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1548 93.3 -2.71 -2.47 0.779 44.6% -4 — — 26.7% -1.73 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.51
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1492 101.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — 0–2 — -0.05
Career — 2179 157.0 +4.72 +0.85 1.143 52.6% +34 -156 -154 62.7% +0.95 70–37 (65%) 48–45 (52%) 107.2 -1.63 — 1777 123.8 -2.10 +0.33 0.915 48.0% +3 -88 -35 41.7% -0.74 31–38 (45%) 23–16 (59%) 104.4 +1.33

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.