H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Naomi Osaka vs Su-Wei Hsieh H2H: 4-1

Naomi Osaka holds a 4–1 lead over Su-Wei Hsieh in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Naomi Osaka leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Naomi Osaka won the 2021 Australian Open quarterfinal 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Naomi Osaka
Japan Age 28 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Su-Wei Hsieh
Chinese Taipei Age 40 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Naomi Osaka #3 6-2 6-2 Su-Wei Hsieh #71 Match data Feb 18, 2021* QF Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Naomi Osaka #1 7-6(3) 5-7 6-2 Su-Wei Hsieh #30 Match data Aug 16, 2019* R16 Cincinnati Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Naomi Osaka #1 6-4 6-3 Su-Wei Hsieh #24 Match data Apr 26, 2019* R16 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Su-Wei Hsieh #27 4-6 7-6(4) 6-3 Naomi Osaka #1 Match data Mar 24, 2019* R32 Miami Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Naomi Osaka #4 5-7 6-4 6-1 Su-Wei Hsieh #27 Match data Jan 19, 2019* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Naomi Osaka #13 #1 7,985 2,179 249 135 64.8% 4 2 0 1 1 8
Su-Wei Hsieh #909 #23 1,960 1,880 153 176 46.5% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Naomi Osaka Su-Wei Hsieh
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2001 5–2 71.4% #164 1,548 0 0
16 2014 2–2 50.0% #260 1,530 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #267 1,540 0 0
17 2015 0–2 0.0% #144 1,508 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2016 20–13 60.6% #48 1,700 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2017 19–22 46.3% #68 1,695 0 0 2005 0–3 0.0% #142 1,506 0 0
20 2018 40–20 66.7% #5 1,902 1 2 2006 0–4 0.0% #129 1,462 0 0
21 2019 40–13 75.5% #3 2,047 2 5 2007 1–7 12.5% #157 1,419 0 0
22 2020 16–3 84.2% #3 2,111 3 6 2008 5–8 38.5% #81 1,483 0 0
23 2021 20–8 71.4% #13 2,040 4 7 2009 1–2 33.3% #314 1,473 0 0
24 2022 15–11 57.7% #42 1,933 4 7 2010 0–2 0.0% #362 1,454 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2011 1–1 50.0% #172 1,458 0 0
26 2024 21–17 55.3% #57 1,872 4 7 2012 22–14 61.1% #25 1,672 0 2
27 2025 31–14 68.9% #16 1,965 4 8 2013 13–25 34.2% #86 1,554 0 2
28 2026 25–10 71.4% #13 2,047 4 8 2014 6–12 33.3% #141 1,542 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2015 6–5 54.5% #93 1,581 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2016 12–12 50.0% #87 1,586 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2017 8–15 34.8% #82 1,600 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2018 32–17 65.3% #28 1,778 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2019 31–24 56.4% #32 1,781 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2020 1–7 12.5% #67 1,706 0 3
35 — — — — — — — 2021 9–14 39.1% #108 1,686 0 3
37 — — — — — — — 2023 0–1 0.0% #713 1,658 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Naomi Osaka Su-Wei Hsieh
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — —
16 2014 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 2015 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 18 11 29 62.1% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 13 13 26 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0% 2005 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2018 29 13 42 69.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 2006 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2019 30 7 37 81.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2020 16 3 19 84.2% — — — — — — — — 2008 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2021 18 5 23 78.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2009 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
24 2022 14 9 23 60.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2010 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2024 13 9 22 59.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2012 15 7 22 68.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 2025 25 8 33 75.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2013 10 18 28 35.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 2026 10 5 15 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2014 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 6 6 12 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 5 9 14 35.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 21 9 30 70.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 23 16 39 59.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 5 5 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 9 9 18 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 188 87 275 68.4% 36 31 67 53.7% 25 17 42 59.5% — 112 112 224 50.0% 21 37 58 36.2% 20 27 47 42.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 347/384 of Naomi Osaka's and 285/321 of Su-Wei Hsieh's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Naomi Osaka Su-Wei Hsieh
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2014 4/4 4.3 1.8 55.4% 65.3% 44.8% 33.6% 49.2% 55.5% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 33/33 4.8 2.5 55.2% 69.6% 48.3% 54.8% 51.5% 59.9% 43.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 40/41 4.2 2.5 55.9% 67.2% 45.7% 45.6% 46.3% 57.5% 40.2% 2005 1/3 0.0 1.0 68.9% 45.2% 28.6% 44.4% 0.0% 40.0% 31.9%
20 2018 55/60 4.7 2.1 59.7% 71.1% 48.8% 55.8% 55.7% 61.9% 45.3% 2006 2/4 0.0 1.5 70.8% 54.2% 53.1% 56.9% 10.7% 53.2% 36.5%
21 2019 50/53 7.0 1.9 60.2% 73.1% 47.9% 56.3% 51.0% 63.1% 44.4% 2007 3/8 0.3 3.0 58.2% 61.7% 45.8% 57.9% 26.5% 55.0% 34.9%
22 2020 18/19 7.8 2.5 59.0% 76.0% 53.0% 64.2% 43.2% 66.5% 42.5% 2008 11/13 1.1 3.7 53.2% 62.4% 43.3% 51.4% 38.7% 53.6% 42.4%
23 2021 21/28 6.5 2.8 53.5% 76.2% 52.2% 59.4% 52.6% 64.9% 43.6% 2009 3/3 0.3 3.7 58.9% 51.8% 46.8% 29.4% 52.6% 49.8% 48.1%
24 2022 22/26 5.7 2.5 51.4% 76.9% 47.4% 61.9% 44.1% 62.7% 41.4% 2010 2/2 0.5 4.0 60.9% 63.3% 38.7% 52.2% 46.3% 53.7% 43.8%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 2/2 0.0 2.5 62.8% 59.0% 52.3% 72.4% 57.5% 56.4% 54.5%
26 2024 36/38 6.5 2.7 54.0% 75.1% 51.1% 56.3% 50.1% 64.0% 40.4% 2012 29/36 0.6 2.5 64.5% 63.4% 48.2% 50.2% 45.6% 58.1% 47.7%
27 2025 34/46 6.6 2.9 56.9% 74.7% 49.3% 52.5% 53.6% 63.5% 45.2% 2013 33/38 0.7 3.0 62.9% 54.8% 42.6% 45.6% 49.0% 50.2% 43.3%
28 2026 34/36 5.8 2.4 59.1% 72.4% 51.0% 50.6% 48.8% 63.6% 43.0% 2014 14/18 0.9 2.6 61.9% 54.6% 40.0% 41.3% 41.6% 49.3% 42.3%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 7/11 2.1 2.9 61.0% 61.1% 53.7% 55.2% 49.1% 58.2% 41.7%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 24/24 1.1 2.6 58.5% 61.5% 47.9% 48.7% 43.8% 55.8% 43.3%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 23/23 1.1 2.7 63.4% 56.9% 39.7% 45.0% 49.8% 50.5% 44.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 46/49 0.8 3.1 63.3% 60.9% 47.5% 57.5% 54.0% 56.0% 47.2%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 53/55 0.7 3.2 64.4% 61.9% 46.6% 51.7% 47.6% 56.5% 44.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 8/8 0.1 3.0 61.2% 53.2% 42.9% 42.4% 53.9% 48.9% 40.7%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 23/23 0.7 3.1 64.0% 55.2% 43.8% 49.8% 41.6% 51.7% 43.2%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 1/1 1.0 2.0 64.9% 60.0% 44.4% 16.7% 45.5% 54.5% 45.5%
Career — 347/386 5.8 2.4 57.0% 72.6% 49.1% 54.6% 50.4% 62.3% 43.1% — 285/329 0.8 2.9 62.6% 59.3% 45.3% 50.0% 47.0% 54.1% 44.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Naomi Osaka Su-Wei Hsieh
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1548 108.6 — — — — +31 — — 63.2% +1.00 3–2 (60%) 0–2 — +1.12
16 2014 1531 113.5 +0.17 +0.57 0.923 48.4% +17 — — 45.5% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.19 2002 1541 99.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.23
17 2015 1509 102.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2016 1700 128.3 +3.18 +0.66 1.091 51.9% -10 -101 — 60.0% +0.65 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2017 1696 132.1 +1.31 -2.13 0.947 48.9% +6 -84 -47 45.8% -0.18 5–4 (56%) 2–5 (29%) — -1.51 2005 1506 99.1 -0.87 -2.03 0.532 35.9% +18 — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 0–1 — -0.18
20 2018 1902 160.7 +5.21 +2.94 1.190 53.8% +17 -236 -168 67.5% +1.35 4–3 (57%) 4–4 (50%) — -2.09 2006 1462 97.2 -0.43 -2.06 0.780 45.6% — — — 11.1% -2.11 0–1 — — +0.03
21 2019 2047 154.9 +5.80 +1.63 1.202 53.6% +30 -229 -350 68.4% +1.22 17–2 (89%) 10–4 (71%) — +0.60 2007 1419 94.3 -0.52 -2.42 0.776 45.0% +29 — — 22.2% -2.00 0–2 0–1 — -0.15
22 2020 2112 156.0 +6.66 +1.24 1.267 54.0% +19 — — 71.7% +1.61 9–1 (90%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.42 2008 1483 115.6 -0.18 -0.54 0.915 47.9% +35 -31 — 40.0% -0.83 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -0.39
23 2021 2040 154.1 +6.00 +1.08 1.240 54.0% +82 -235 — 72.2% +1.43 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.04 2009 1473 99.4 -1.34 -1.35 0.959 48.9% +30 — — 33.3% -0.83 — — — +0.39
24 2022 1934 147.8 +4.77 +0.02 1.112 52.0% +91 -156 — 57.4% +0.81 4–1 (80%) 0–2 — -0.62 2010 1454 101.1 -0.49 +0.07 0.946 48.5% — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–2 — -0.03
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1459 105.4 -0.05 -0.94 1.250 55.5% — — — 60.0% +1.40 0–1 0–1 — +0.27
26 2024 1873 146.8 +5.89 -1.17 1.122 52.2% +76 -98 -157 56.3% +0.71 3–5 (38%) 4–8 (33%) — -2.05 2012 1672 133.4 +1.38 +2.74 1.138 52.7% -4 -182 -35 58.2% +0.62 7–6 (54%) 5–5 (50%) — +0.40
27 2025 1965 153.3 +4.79 +1.97 1.240 54.1% +60 -127 -252 65.4% +1.12 11–9 (55%) 10–6 (63%) — +0.92 2013 1554 116.0 -3.73 +0.15 0.871 46.8% +4 -81 +19 37.6% -1.02 3–6 (33%) 5–7 (42%) — -0.23
28 2026 2048 155.9 +5.36 +1.23 1.180 53.4% -6 -103 -113 68.4% +1.21 6–2 (75%) 7–3 (70%) — -0.68 2014 1542 107.7 -3.95 -1.33 0.834 45.9% +33 — — 35.7% -1.24 3–3 (50%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.26
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1582 111.2 -0.41 -0.09 0.996 50.3% +31 — — 48.1% +0.04 4–1 (80%) 1–0 — +0.05
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1586 119.0 -0.64 +0.61 0.979 49.4% -1 -70 -44 47.4% -0.11 6–3 (67%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.11
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1601 109.3 -4.05 +0.79 0.895 47.4% -15 -59 -29 37.0% -0.98 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.19
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1778 132.6 -0.63 +4.07 1.073 51.5% -22 -182 -83 58.2% +0.56 12–6 (67%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.49
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1781 146.5 +0.12 +2.75 1.033 50.7% +29 -185 -15 52.6% +0.24 16–9 (64%) 10–8 (56%) — -1.32
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1707 118.1 -2.64 +0.13 0.796 44.9% +27 -121 — 17.6% -2.35 0–1 1–0 — -0.47
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1687 126.8 -2.62 -0.02 0.895 47.4% +64 -177 — 43.1% -0.80 3–4 (43%) 4–0 (100%) — -1.53
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1658 96.7 -0.52 -0.38 1.002 49.4% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.20
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1628 102.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2179 156.7 +4.73 +0.85 1.145 52.7% +35 -157 -155 62.9% +0.96 68–37 (65%) 48–45 (52%) 106.6 -1.63 — 1881 128.6 -1.28 +1.42 0.970 49.3% +14 -131 -34 46.0% -0.30 63–56 (53%) 39–44 (47%) 103.9 -0.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.