H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Ons Jabeur vs Shelby Rogers H2H: 2-0
Ons Jabeur holds a 2–0 lead over Shelby Rogers in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ons Jabeur leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ons Jabeur won the 2022 US Open third round 4-6 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TUN
Age 31
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 33
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2022* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Ons Jabeur | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | Shelby Rogers | Match data |
| Aug 10, 2019 | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Ons Jabeur | 7-5 2-6 7-6(5) | Shelby Rogers | Match data |
| Feb 3, 2017* | Taipei | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Ons Jabeur | 7-5 6-2 | Shelby Rogers | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ons Jabeur | #439 | #2 | 5,210 | 2,105 | 222 | 151 | 59.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
| Shelby Rogers | #437 | #30 | 1,698 | 1,875 | 126 | 138 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ons Jabeur | Shelby Rogers | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #260 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #352 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2013 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #426 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2014 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #143 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #220 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #126 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #72 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #88 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #151 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #60 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #76 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #59 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #31 | 1,858 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #630 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #10 | 1,982 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 47–17 | 73.4% | #2 | 2,007 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #60 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2023 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #6 | 1,952 | 0 | 5 | 2021 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #40 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2024 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #42 | 1,856 | 0 | 5 | 2022 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #47 | 1,820 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2025 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #75 | 1,820 | 0 | 5 | 2023 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #149 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #341 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |