H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Paula Badosa vs Jil Teichmann H2H: 3-0
Paula Badosa holds a 3–0 lead over Jil Teichmann in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Paula Badosa leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Paula Badosa won the 2021 Madrid third round 5-7 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 28
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 29
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2021* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Paula Badosa | 5-7 6-1 6-2 | Jil Teichmann | Match data |
| Mar 25, 2021* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Paula Badosa | 5-6 (ret.) | Jil Teichmann | Match data |
| Sep 19, 2019* | Seoul | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Paula Badosa | 6-4 6-4 | Jil Teichmann | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paula Badosa | #115 | #2 | 5,045 | 2,040 | 172 | 112 | 60.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Jil Teichmann | #119 | #21 | 2,101 | 1,876 | 98 | 107 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paula Badosa | Jil Teichmann | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #230 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #246 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #97 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #69 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2020 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #70 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2021 | 40–16 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,970 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #37 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2022 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #13 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #35 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2023 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #64 | 1,914 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #147 | 1,613 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2024 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 2,018 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2025 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #25 | 1,955 | 0 | 4 | 2025 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #123 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2026 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #115 | 1,885 | 0 | 4 | 2026 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #119 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 |