H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 22:32 UTC
Paula Badosa vs Saisai Zheng H2H: 1-0
Paula Badosa holds a 1–0 lead over Saisai Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Paula Badosa leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Paula Badosa won the 2015 Miami second round 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 28
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2015* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Paula Badosa | 6-1 7-5 | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paula Badosa | #115 | #2 | 5,045 | 2,040 | 172 | 112 | 60.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Saisai Zheng | #692 | #34 | 1,585 | 1,776 | 83 | 130 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Paula Badosa | Saisai Zheng | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #230 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #246 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #97 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #72 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #70 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #85 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 40–16 | 71.4% | #8 | 1,970 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #13 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #38 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #64 | 1,914 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #42 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 |
| 2024 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 2,018 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 2025 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #25 | 1,955 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #79 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 2026 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #115 | 1,885 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #692 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |