H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:30 UTC
Petra Martic vs Qiang Wang H2H: 0-2
Qiang Wang holds a 2–0 lead over Petra Martic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Qiang Wang leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Qiang Wang won the 2021 Parma quarterfinal 7-6(4) 3-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 35
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2021* | Parma | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Qiang Wang | 7-6(4) 3-6 7-5 | Petra Martic | Match data |
| May 31, 2018* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Qiang Wang | 6-1 6-1 | Petra Martic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petra Martic | #349 | #14 | 2,850 | 1,942 | 212 | 214 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,925 | 128 | 125 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Petra Martic | Qiang Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #330 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #215 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #82 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #142 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #50 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #107 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 2014 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #186 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 |
| 2015 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #262 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #89 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #32 | 1,795 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #15 | 1,903 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #18 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #54 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,794 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #40 | 1,808 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #122 | 1,649 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #209 | 1,611 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |