H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Qiang Wang vs Casey Dellacqua H2H: 0-1
Casey Dellacqua holds a 1–0 lead over Qiang Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Casey Dellacqua leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Casey Dellacqua won the 2014 US Open second round 4-6 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 41
Left-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2014* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Casey Dellacqua | 4-6 6-4 6-2 | Qiang Wang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,925 | 128 | 125 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Casey Dellacqua | #932 | #26 | 1,725 | 1,761 | 79 | 105 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Qiang Wang | Casey Dellacqua | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #157 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #53 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1002 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #227 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #134 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #101 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #142 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #29 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #116 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |