H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Qiang Wang vs Lauren Davis H2H: 2-0

Qiang Wang holds a 2–0 lead over Lauren Davis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Qiang Wang leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Qiang Wang won the 2022 Guadalajara first round 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Qiang Wang
China Age 34 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Lauren Davis
United States Age 32 Right-Handed 157 cm / 5'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Qiang Wang #144 6-2 6-1 Lauren Davis #87 Match data Feb 24, 2022* R32 Guadalajara WTA 250 Hard
Qiang Wang #15 6-3 6-2 Lauren Davis #99 Match data Jun 20, 2019* R32 Birmingham Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Lauren Davis #55 6-3 6-3 Qiang Wang #80 Match data Feb 12, 2017 Q2 Q Qatar Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Qiang Wang #421 #12 2,946 1,931 129 127 50.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Lauren Davis #499 #26 1,646 1,837 143 182 44.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Qiang Wang Lauren Davis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2011 0–3 0.0% #319 1,469 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2012 4–6 40.0% #91 1,496 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2013 13–17 43.3% #70 1,575 0 0
20 2012 0–3 0.0% #185 1,458 0 0 2014 21–20 51.2% #55 1,654 0 0
21 2013 1–1 50.0% #226 1,474 0 0 2015 13–21 38.2% #88 1,579 0 0
22 2014 1–2 33.3% #102 1,467 0 0 2016 15–9 62.5% #61 1,699 0 0
23 2015 4–14 22.2% #110 1,448 0 0 2017 20–22 47.6% #50 1,624 0 1
24 2016 9–12 42.9% #72 1,538 0 0 2018 2–6 25.0% #173 1,603 0 1
25 2017 24–19 55.8% #45 1,720 0 0 2019 9–12 42.9% #64 1,733 0 1
26 2018 37–21 63.8% #21 1,906 0 2 2020 5–9 35.7% #75 1,622 0 1
27 2019 23–18 56.1% #30 1,792 0 2 2021 12–16 42.9% #89 1,646 0 1
28 2020 7–6 53.8% #34 1,765 0 2 2022 13–17 43.3% #87 1,714 0 1
29 2021 10–14 41.7% #104 1,713 0 2 2023 14–16 46.7% #68 1,682 0 2
30 2022 13–13 50.0% #91 1,717 0 2 2024 0–5 0.0% #270 1,625 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2025 2–3 40.0% #362 1,592 0 2
32 2024 0–4 0.0% #376 1,623 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Qiang Wang Lauren Davis
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 11 12 23 47.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
20 2012 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 13 12 25 52.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 3 9 66.7%
21 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 7 14 21 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
22 2014 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2016 15 6 21 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2015 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2017 14 13 27 51.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3%
24 2016 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2018 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2017 18 13 31 58.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2019 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2018 32 15 47 68.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2020 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
27 2019 16 10 26 61.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2021 5 9 14 35.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1%
28 2020 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — — 2022 6 8 14 42.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9%
29 2021 4 9 13 30.8% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — 2023 10 8 18 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 2022 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2024 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 2024 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 103 89 192 53.6% 21 27 48 43.8% 5 11 16 31.2% — 97 113 210 46.2% 25 41 66 37.9% 21 28 49 42.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 239/257 of Qiang Wang's and 304/325 of Lauren Davis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Qiang Wang Lauren Davis
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 3/3 0.7 3.0 49.5% 55.1% 40.4% 46.3% 16.7% 47.3% 23.6%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 10/10 1.0 2.2 66.5% 59.2% 48.6% 48.5% 36.9% 55.6% 42.9%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 23/30 0.7 2.6 62.6% 56.8% 42.6% 49.6% 41.8% 51.6% 39.9%
20 2012 3/3 0.0 2.3 63.7% 51.1% 37.0% 33.2% 54.2% 46.3% 37.9% 2014 38/41 0.8 2.9 63.1% 60.7% 42.4% 47.5% 42.8% 54.0% 42.8%
21 2013 1/2 2.0 1.0 69.4% 59.3% 57.7% 37.5% 26.3% 58.8% 47.6% 2015 29/34 1.0 4.4 64.0% 63.0% 46.0% 43.8% 54.2% 56.8% 40.7%
22 2014 2/3 4.0 1.0 56.4% 70.6% 54.4% 81.8% 42.4% 62.7% 49.1% 2016 19/24 1.6 2.9 59.7% 62.9% 44.5% 51.5% 50.5% 55.7% 45.3%
23 2015 10/18 2.5 3.0 64.1% 59.0% 45.4% 48.0% 33.2% 53.6% 37.0% 2017 41/42 1.4 5.6 60.5% 59.3% 40.8% 50.4% 56.0% 52.1% 47.6%
24 2016 18/22 2.2 2.9 63.0% 62.4% 44.4% 53.3% 46.6% 55.9% 41.6% 2018 8/8 1.5 6.3 59.3% 57.6% 37.5% 54.0% 48.6% 49.5% 41.6%
25 2017 43/43 2.7 1.8 63.1% 63.9% 50.5% 55.7% 49.0% 58.9% 46.3% 2019 21/21 1.6 3.4 61.4% 60.2% 48.6% 60.3% 50.7% 55.7% 41.3%
26 2018 57/58 2.6 1.7 62.4% 65.2% 48.8% 52.5% 49.8% 59.1% 47.4% 2020 14/14 1.4 1.7 66.5% 57.2% 45.3% 49.9% 52.1% 53.2% 43.2%
27 2019 40/41 2.4 2.1 61.7% 63.9% 49.5% 56.1% 52.1% 58.0% 43.6% 2021 28/28 1.9 3.0 55.3% 63.8% 44.5% 46.1% 45.0% 55.1% 42.0%
28 2020 13/13 1.3 1.8 60.2% 63.2% 53.7% 51.1% 44.2% 59.4% 43.6% 2022 30/30 2.1 3.4 56.8% 64.4% 42.8% 50.4% 50.5% 54.9% 42.7%
29 2021 22/24 3.5 3.6 58.5% 60.7% 44.5% 53.9% 39.5% 53.9% 43.9% 2023 30/30 1.6 3.4 61.1% 61.0% 45.3% 48.1% 52.8% 54.9% 42.8%
30 2022 26/26 2.1 1.7 63.8% 61.7% 47.7% 53.8% 50.2% 56.6% 42.6% 2024 5/5 0.6 3.0 56.6% 48.9% 39.4% 44.0% 51.9% 43.5% 35.7%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 5/5 0.8 1.6 57.8% 48.9% 44.0% 47.2% 43.9% 47.3% 41.8%
32 2024 4/4 1.0 2.5 61.2% 54.3% 27.9% 38.6% 51.4% 45.2% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 239/257 2.4 2.1 62.2% 63.0% 48.1% 53.5% 47.8% 57.3% 44.4% — 304/325 1.4 3.5 60.8% 60.5% 43.8% 49.3% 48.9% 53.9% 42.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Qiang Wang Lauren Davis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1469 96.1 -1.99 -3.92 0.448 35.8% +25 — — 0.0% -3.83 — 0–1 — +0.06
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1497 108.5 -1.41 -0.02 0.967 49.1% +2 +46 — 42.9% -0.10 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.28
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1576 111.7 -3.39 -2.88 0.824 45.7% +11 -54 -36 40.6% -1.01 7–4 (64%) 6–2 (75%) 108.1 -0.03
20 2012 1459 93.4 -2.59 -4.30 0.705 42.2% +20 — — 14.3% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.34 2014 1654 126.2 -1.49 -0.23 0.930 48.3% -1 -154 +33 51.1% -0.11 6–4 (60%) 5–1 (83%) 105.7 +0.07
21 2013 1474 106.8 +1.03 +1.18 1.155 52.7% — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — -0.12 2015 1580 117.4 -0.82 -0.57 0.941 48.6% -2 -59 +76 36.0% -1.15 6–5 (55%) 7–4 (64%) 103.8 -1.82
22 2014 1468 102.3 -0.40 -0.04 1.315 56.2% +13 — — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.36 2016 1699 128.3 -1.36 +1.29 1.023 50.4% +49 — — 57.1% +0.29 6–4 (60%) 2–1 (67%) 104.7 -0.31
23 2015 1449 112.8 -2.12 -2.78 0.797 45.2% +43 — — 31.8% -1.18 2–6 (25%) 1–1 — +0.30 2017 1624 128.1 -3.03 +3.62 0.995 50.0% +63 -69 -64 47.4% -0.11 6–7 (46%) 4–3 (57%) 99.9 +0.39
24 2016 1539 124.4 +0.50 0.00 0.943 48.8% +23 -27 — 43.5% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 1–0 — -0.52 2018 1603 108.4 -2.94 -0.71 0.824 45.7% +42 — — 30.0% -1.00 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +0.10
25 2017 1721 140.3 +2.20 +2.13 1.126 52.2% +4 -118 — 57.4% +0.51 5–10 (33%) 5–4 (56%) 97.5 -0.59 2019 1734 133.2 -0.71 -1.22 0.932 48.8% -2 -166 -55 43.2% -0.39 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 103.3 -0.90
26 2018 1906 152.9 +2.58 +4.18 1.157 53.0% +14 -273 — 61.1% +1.10 9–5 (64%) 1–3 (25%) 102.8 -1.43 2020 1623 118.4 -2.04 -0.34 0.923 48.3% +39 — — 40.6% -0.75 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 96.2 -0.17
27 2019 1793 132.7 +1.42 +0.89 1.038 50.7% +55 -204 -179 55.6% +0.16 4–6 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.2 +1.10 2021 1646 122.0 -1.24 -0.82 0.936 48.4% -3 -115 +89 42.6% -0.66 5–4 (56%) 1–3 (25%) 101.0 -0.59
28 2020 1766 129.1 +2.56 +1.23 1.073 51.4% +32 — — 53.3% +0.03 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 98.7 +0.36 2022 1715 129.3 -1.29 -0.08 0.947 48.7% -7 -84 -9 42.4% -0.62 4–4 (50%) 4–6 (40%) 99.0 -1.24
29 2021 1714 121.2 -1.69 +0.38 0.952 48.9% -23 -55 — 44.1% -0.42 5–6 (45%) 3–1 (75%) 100.4 +0.25 2023 1682 126.0 -1.26 -0.82 0.950 48.9% +20 -11 -71 50.7% -0.24 5–8 (38%) 6–0 (100%) 100.9 -0.58
30 2022 1717 128.6 +0.18 +0.03 0.981 49.6% +35 — -160 45.2% -0.11 8–2 (80%) 2–8 (20%) 101.7 -0.05 2024 1625 96.9 -3.79 -3.39 0.631 39.9% — — — 9.1% -3.18 0–1 0–1 — -0.30
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1593 110.2 -1.83 -2.46 0.794 44.6% +38 — — 33.3% -1.42 2–0 — — 0.00
32 2024 1624 97.7 -3.97 -0.81 0.667 41.0% +19 — — 11.1% -3.00 0–1 — — -0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1931 138.9 +1.10 +1.45 1.038 50.7% +22 -151 -171 50.5% +0.07 38–44 (46%) 22–21 (51%) 100.4 -0.15 — 1838 128.2 -1.76 -0.15 0.925 48.3% +20 -77 +9 43.9% -0.54 53–48 (52%) 39–29 (57%) 108.1 -1.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.