H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Qiang Wang vs Mirjana Lucic-Baroni H2H: 0-2

Mirjana Lucic-Baroni holds a 2–0 lead over Qiang Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mirjana Lucic-Baroni leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mirjana Lucic-Baroni won the 2017 Australian Open first round 4-6 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Qiang Wang
China Age 34 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni
CRO Age 44 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #79 4-6 6-3 6-4 Qiang Wang #71 Match data Jan 18, 2017* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #66 6-2 2-6 6-1 Qiang Wang #73 Match data May 18, 2016* R32 Strasbourg Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Qiang Wang #421 #12 2,946 1,931 129 127 50.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #424 #20 1,924 1,798 136 166 45.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Qiang Wang Mirjana Lucic-Baroni
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1997 11–3 78.6% #49 1,676 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1998 15–11 57.7% #51 1,768 0 2
17 — — — — — — — 1999 11–13 45.8% #48 1,753 0 2
18 — — — — — — — 2000 2–12 14.3% #202 1,599 0 2
19 — — — — — — — 2001 2–3 40.0% #192 1,595 0 2
20 2012 0–3 0.0% #185 1,458 0 0 2002 1–6 14.3% #203 1,545 0 2
21 2013 1–1 50.0% #226 1,474 0 0 2003 0–2 0.0% #348 1,524 0 2
22 2014 1–2 33.3% #102 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2015 4–14 22.2% #110 1,448 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2016 9–12 42.9% #72 1,538 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2017 24–19 55.8% #45 1,720 0 0 2007 1–1 50.0% #455 1,537 0 2
26 2018 37–21 63.8% #21 1,906 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 2019 23–18 56.1% #30 1,792 0 2 2009 0–1 0.0% #258 1,518 0 2
28 2020 7–6 53.8% #34 1,765 0 2 2010 5–6 45.5% #96 1,554 0 2
29 2021 10–14 41.7% #104 1,713 0 2 2011 8–14 36.4% #129 1,551 0 2
30 2022 13–13 50.0% #91 1,717 0 2 2012 7–12 36.8% #105 1,535 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2013 8–11 42.1% #110 1,562 0 2
32 2024 0–4 0.0% #376 1,623 0 2 2014 12–8 60.0% #60 1,706 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2015 17–26 39.5% #68 1,633 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2016 14–18 43.8% #80 1,625 0 3
35 — — — — — — — 2017 20–16 55.6% #32 1,699 0 3
36 — — — — — — — 2018 2–3 40.0% #327 1,690 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Qiang Wang Mirjana Lucic-Baroni
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2 1 3 66.7% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 4 7 11 36.4% 10 2 12 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1 6 7 14.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
20 2012 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2014 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2015 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2016 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2017 18 13 31 58.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2007 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2018 32 15 47 68.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2019 16 10 26 61.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2020 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
29 2021 4 9 13 30.8% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — 2011 2 6 8 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
30 2022 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2012 3 6 9 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
32 2024 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 11 4 15 73.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 12 18 30 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 5 11 16 31.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 14 9 23 60.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 103 89 192 53.6% 21 27 48 43.8% 5 11 16 31.2% — — — — — 66 98 164 40.2% 49 42 91 53.8% 21 24 45 46.7% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 239/257 of Qiang Wang's and 130/155 of Mirjana Lucic-Baroni's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Qiang Wang Mirjana Lucic-Baroni
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2012 3/3 0.0 2.3 63.7% 51.1% 37.0% 33.2% 54.2% 46.3% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2013 1/2 2.0 1.0 69.4% 59.3% 57.7% 37.5% 26.3% 58.8% 47.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2014 2/3 4.0 1.0 56.4% 70.6% 54.4% 81.8% 42.4% 62.7% 49.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2015 10/18 2.5 3.0 64.1% 59.0% 45.4% 48.0% 33.2% 53.6% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2016 18/22 2.2 2.9 63.0% 62.4% 44.4% 53.3% 46.6% 55.9% 41.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2017 43/43 2.7 1.8 63.1% 63.9% 50.5% 55.7% 49.0% 58.9% 46.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2018 57/58 2.6 1.7 62.4% 65.2% 48.8% 52.5% 49.8% 59.1% 47.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2019 40/41 2.4 2.1 61.7% 63.9% 49.5% 56.1% 52.1% 58.0% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2020 13/13 1.3 1.8 60.2% 63.2% 53.7% 51.1% 44.2% 59.4% 43.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2021 22/24 3.5 3.6 58.5% 60.7% 44.5% 53.9% 39.5% 53.9% 43.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2022 26/26 2.1 1.7 63.8% 61.7% 47.7% 53.8% 50.2% 56.6% 42.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 9/19 4.1 4.1 56.7% 68.4% 48.1% 53.6% 49.9% 59.4% 41.5%
32 2024 4/4 1.0 2.5 61.2% 54.3% 27.9% 38.6% 51.4% 45.2% 36.5% 2014 20/20 4.3 5.3 53.7% 68.8% 48.0% 62.8% 45.7% 59.1% 44.5%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 29/43 3.6 6.9 56.7% 63.3% 46.8% 46.1% 48.6% 56.4% 38.2%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 31/32 2.5 6.3 55.5% 65.0% 41.4% 44.4% 54.4% 54.7% 47.6%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 36/36 3.2 6.6 57.5% 64.6% 41.2% 51.9% 58.5% 54.6% 43.6%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 5/5 1.4 5.2 54.9% 60.4% 37.5% 48.1% 68.9% 50.9% 37.9%
Career — 239/257 2.4 2.1 62.2% 63.0% 48.1% 53.5% 47.8% 57.3% 44.4% — 130/302 3.3 6.2 56.1% 65.1% 43.9% 50.4% 53.2% 55.9% 43.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Qiang Wang Mirjana Lucic-Baroni
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1676 143.4 — — — — -116 +86 — 67.7% +1.23 4–1 (80%) 3–2 (60%) 105.4 +0.12
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1769 134.7 — — — — -188 +120 — 52.6% +0.37 5–2 (71%) 2–4 (33%) 101.1 +0.58
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1754 132.9 — — — — -144 — -16 45.6% -0.53 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 107.0 -0.60
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1599 100.7 — — — — -42 +102 +114 19.4% -2.00 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 95.6 -0.28
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1595 108.4 — — — — — +137 — 36.4% -0.27 1–0 0–1 — -0.02
20 2012 1459 93.4 -2.59 -4.30 0.705 42.2% +20 — — 14.3% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.34 2002 1545 104.2 — — — — -70 — — 20.0% -2.53 0–1 0–1 — -0.26
21 2013 1474 106.8 +1.03 +1.18 1.155 52.7% — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — -0.12 2003 1525 101.6 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — -0.09
22 2014 1468 102.3 -0.40 -0.04 1.315 56.2% +13 — — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2015 1449 112.8 -2.12 -2.78 0.797 45.2% +43 — — 31.8% -1.18 2–6 (25%) 1–1 — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2016 1539 124.4 +0.50 0.00 0.943 48.8% +23 -27 — 43.5% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 1–0 — -0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2017 1721 140.3 +2.20 +2.13 1.126 52.2% +4 -118 — 57.4% +0.51 5–10 (33%) 5–4 (56%) 97.5 -0.59 2007 1537 109.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.75 — 1–0 — -0.13
26 2018 1906 152.9 +2.58 +4.18 1.157 53.0% +14 -273 — 61.1% +1.10 9–5 (64%) 1–3 (25%) 102.8 -1.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2019 1793 132.7 +1.42 +0.89 1.038 50.7% +55 -204 -179 55.6% +0.16 4–6 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.2 +1.10 2009 1518 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.18
28 2020 1766 129.1 +2.56 +1.23 1.073 51.4% +32 — — 53.3% +0.03 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 98.7 +0.36 2010 1554 111.8 — — — — -70 — +160 44.4% -0.52 3–2 (60%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.12
29 2021 1714 121.2 -1.69 +0.38 0.952 48.9% -23 -55 — 44.1% -0.42 5–6 (45%) 3–1 (75%) 100.4 +0.25 2011 1551 110.1 — — — — -82 +119 +144 41.2% -0.96 2–5 (29%) 5–2 (71%) 100.3 -0.83
30 2022 1717 128.6 +0.18 +0.03 0.981 49.6% +35 — -160 45.2% -0.11 8–2 (80%) 2–8 (20%) 101.7 -0.05 2012 1535 107.2 — — — — -72 +122 +176 39.1% -1.13 4–4 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.2 +0.36
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1562 122.6 +0.65 -0.89 1.023 51.1% -102 +80 +154 47.5% +0.25 1–3 (25%) 0–3 (0%) 95.1 -0.31
32 2024 1624 97.7 -3.97 -0.81 0.667 41.0% +19 — — 11.1% -3.00 0–1 — — -0.38 2014 1707 129.5 +2.54 +0.56 1.087 51.8% -37 -115 — 59.5% +0.71 3–1 (75%) 3–4 (43%) 103.2 -0.45
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1634 127.2 -1.64 -2.22 0.875 47.8% -4 -66 +47 43.0% -0.22 7–12 (37%) 2–10 (17%) 93.1 -0.40
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1625 127.9 -1.32 +3.68 1.050 51.1% -46 +79 -10 47.9% +0.14 3–6 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 95.8 -0.85
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1699 137.2 -0.69 +1.19 0.960 49.5% +14 +54 — 52.4% +0.08 10–6 (63%) 3–5 (38%) 101.6 -0.19
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1690 108.4 -2.20 -1.43 0.772 44.8% +7 — — 40.0% -0.60 2–0 1–0 — +0.03
Career — 1931 138.9 +1.10 +1.45 1.038 50.7% +22 -151 -171 50.5% +0.07 38–44 (46%) 22–21 (51%) 100.4 -0.15 — 1799 132.5 -0.52 +0.68 0.977 49.8% -54 +70 +84 45.8% -0.27 51–50 (50%) 31–45 (41%) 97.4 -1.09

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.