H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Qiang Wang vs Mirjana Lucic-Baroni H2H: 0-2
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni holds a 2–0 lead over Qiang Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mirjana Lucic-Baroni leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mirjana Lucic-Baroni won the 2017 Australian Open first round 4-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 44
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2017* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Qiang Wang | Match data |
| May 18, 2016* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | 6-2 2-6 6-1 | Qiang Wang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,925 | 128 | 125 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | #424 | #20 | 1,924 | 1,798 | 136 | 166 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Qiang Wang | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 11–3 | 78.6% | #49 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #51 | 1,776 | 0 | 2 |
| 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #48 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 |
| 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #202 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 |
| 2016 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #192 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #203 | 1,546 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #348 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #455 | 1,538 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,519 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #96 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #129 | 1,551 | 0 | 2 |
| 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #105 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #110 | 1,563 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #60 | 1,706 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #68 | 1,657 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #80 | 1,629 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #32 | 1,698 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #327 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 |