H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Qiang Wang vs Mona Barthel H2H: 0-1
Mona Barthel holds a 1–0 lead over Qiang Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mona Barthel leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mona Barthel won the 2017 Rome third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 36
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2017* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Mona Barthel | 6-3 6-4 | Qiang Wang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,925 | 128 | 125 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Mona Barthel | #223 | #23 | 1,762 | 1,841 | 151 | 179 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Qiang Wang | Mona Barthel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #69 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #34 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 |
| 2016 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,712 | 0 | 3 |
| 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #45 | 1,672 | 0 | 3 |
| 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #158 | 1,555 | 0 | 3 |
| 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #48 | 1,600 | 0 | 4 |
| 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #77 | 1,625 | 0 | 4 |
| 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #183 | 1,552 | 0 | 4 |
| 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #275 | 1,458 | 0 | 4 |
| 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,525 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 |