H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Qiang Wang vs Pauline Parmentier H2H: 1-0

Qiang Wang holds a 1–0 lead over Pauline Parmentier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Qiang Wang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Qiang Wang won the 2020 Australian Open first round 7-6(2) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Qiang Wang
China Age 34 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Pauline Parmentier
France Age 40 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Qiang Wang #29 7-6(2) 6-3 Pauline Parmentier #133 Match data Jan 22, 2020* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Qiang Wang #421 #12 2,946 1,931 129 127 50.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Pauline Parmentier #346 #40 1,121 1,703 120 188 39.0% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Qiang Wang Pauline Parmentier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2005 1–2 33.3% #222 1,506 0 0
20 2012 0–3 0.0% #185 1,458 0 0 2006 0–2 0.0% #188 1,487 0 0
21 2013 1–1 50.0% #226 1,474 0 0 2007 9–4 69.2% #57 1,612 0 1
22 2014 1–2 33.3% #102 1,467 0 0 2008 17–21 44.7% #61 1,581 0 2
23 2015 4–14 22.2% #110 1,448 0 0 2009 6–12 33.3% #108 1,533 0 2
24 2016 9–12 42.9% #72 1,538 0 0 2010 4–14 22.2% #105 1,443 0 2
25 2017 24–19 55.8% #45 1,720 0 0 2011 5–13 27.8% #74 1,439 0 2
26 2018 37–21 63.8% #21 1,906 0 2 2012 13–16 44.8% #65 1,567 0 2
27 2019 23–18 56.1% #30 1,792 0 2 2013 1–10 9.1% #229 1,464 0 2
28 2020 7–6 53.8% #34 1,765 0 2 2014 7–10 41.2% #80 1,522 0 2
29 2021 10–14 41.7% #104 1,713 0 2 2015 2–9 18.2% #120 1,459 0 2
30 2022 13–13 50.0% #91 1,717 0 2 2016 13–15 46.4% #70 1,579 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2017 15–19 44.1% #79 1,657 0 2
32 2024 0–4 0.0% #376 1,623 0 2 2018 16–15 51.6% #56 1,683 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2019 11–22 33.3% #123 1,594 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2020 0–4 0.0% #173 1,540 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Qiang Wang Pauline Parmentier
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2012 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 7 2 9 77.8% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2014 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 6 12 18 33.3% 10 7 17 58.8% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
23 2015 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2009 2 4 6 33.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 2016 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 2 4 6 33.3% 2 8 10 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2017 18 13 31 58.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2011 1 7 8 12.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 2018 32 15 47 68.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 9 10 19 47.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2019 16 10 26 61.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2013 1 4 5 20.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2020 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 4 8 12 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2021 4 9 13 30.8% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — 2015 2 4 6 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2022 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2016 5 8 13 38.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 12 11 23 52.2% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
32 2024 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2018 7 10 17 41.2% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 7 11 18 38.9% 2 9 11 18.2% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 103 89 192 53.6% 21 27 48 43.8% 5 11 16 31.2% — — — — — 66 99 165 40.0% 48 70 118 40.7% 5 17 22 22.7% 1 2 3 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 239/257 of Qiang Wang's and 281/306 of Pauline Parmentier's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Qiang Wang Pauline Parmentier
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 1/3 2.0 5.0 50.0% 45.8% 29.2% 25.0% 100.0% 37.5% 30.8%
20 2012 3/3 0.0 2.3 63.7% 51.1% 37.0% 33.2% 54.2% 46.3% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2013 1/2 2.0 1.0 69.4% 59.3% 57.7% 37.5% 26.3% 58.8% 47.6% 2007 5/13 1.8 3.4 50.1% 63.3% 50.9% 51.4% 48.5% 57.2% 42.4%
22 2014 2/3 4.0 1.0 56.4% 70.6% 54.4% 81.8% 42.4% 62.7% 49.1% 2008 31/38 4.3 4.1 56.0% 67.3% 43.8% 55.5% 44.4% 56.8% 40.6%
23 2015 10/18 2.5 3.0 64.1% 59.0% 45.4% 48.0% 33.2% 53.6% 37.0% 2009 17/18 2.9 4.2 58.2% 63.3% 43.6% 50.6% 40.6% 55.0% 40.8%
24 2016 18/22 2.2 2.9 63.0% 62.4% 44.4% 53.3% 46.6% 55.9% 41.6% 2010 17/18 3.8 4.5 56.9% 63.7% 42.1% 49.9% 45.9% 54.4% 40.2%
25 2017 43/43 2.7 1.8 63.1% 63.9% 50.5% 55.7% 49.0% 58.9% 46.3% 2011 15/18 2.4 3.8 58.1% 64.4% 43.8% 50.6% 47.5% 55.6% 41.2%
26 2018 57/58 2.6 1.7 62.4% 65.2% 48.8% 52.5% 49.8% 59.1% 47.4% 2012 28/29 3.4 3.8 58.8% 64.3% 46.8% 57.9% 50.1% 57.1% 41.7%
27 2019 40/41 2.4 2.1 61.7% 63.9% 49.5% 56.1% 52.1% 58.0% 43.6% 2013 10/11 1.6 5.2 60.7% 55.7% 40.2% 31.8% 43.5% 49.5% 37.1%
28 2020 13/13 1.3 1.8 60.2% 63.2% 53.7% 51.1% 44.2% 59.4% 43.6% 2014 17/17 1.9 4.2 57.9% 64.1% 38.9% 43.7% 43.9% 53.9% 40.3%
29 2021 22/24 3.5 3.6 58.5% 60.7% 44.5% 53.9% 39.5% 53.9% 43.9% 2015 11/11 2.7 4.6 58.6% 60.2% 50.4% 45.1% 41.8% 55.7% 35.3%
30 2022 26/26 2.1 1.7 63.8% 61.7% 47.7% 53.8% 50.2% 56.6% 42.6% 2016 28/28 3.0 3.7 58.0% 62.4% 47.0% 55.3% 47.8% 55.8% 43.1%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 34/34 3.0 4.3 57.0% 62.7% 44.2% 53.0% 48.5% 54.7% 43.6%
32 2024 4/4 1.0 2.5 61.2% 54.3% 27.9% 38.6% 51.4% 45.2% 36.5% 2018 31/31 2.4 3.7 60.1% 63.0% 43.0% 55.8% 43.6% 55.0% 40.7%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 32/33 2.2 3.0 58.0% 63.2% 43.8% 52.3% 41.7% 55.0% 39.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 4/4 1.8 3.0 58.6% 59.5% 34.3% 42.8% 50.0% 49.2% 39.0%
Career — 239/257 2.4 2.1 62.2% 63.0% 48.1% 53.5% 47.8% 57.3% 44.4% — 281/308 2.9 3.9 57.9% 63.3% 44.0% 51.9% 45.6% 55.1% 40.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Qiang Wang Pauline Parmentier
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1507 109.7 -0.64 -0.15 0.492 34.5% — — — 28.6% -1.86 1–0 — — -0.04
20 2012 1459 93.4 -2.59 -4.30 0.705 42.2% +20 — — 14.3% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.34 2006 1487 98.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — -0.10
21 2013 1474 106.8 +1.03 +1.18 1.155 52.7% — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — -0.12 2007 1612 120.9 +1.44 -0.59 0.989 49.5% +20 -83 — 67.9% +1.14 1–1 1–0 — +0.74
22 2014 1468 102.3 -0.40 -0.04 1.315 56.2% +13 — — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.36 2008 1581 112.4 +0.75 -3.13 0.940 48.5% -27 +58 +2 45.9% -0.33 4–5 (44%) 3–1 (75%) 101.4 +0.83
23 2015 1449 112.8 -2.12 -2.78 0.797 45.2% +43 — — 31.8% -1.18 2–6 (25%) 1–1 — +0.30 2009 1534 107.8 -0.66 -1.62 0.907 48.1% -3 +30 — 38.1% -0.69 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 97.3 -0.22
24 2016 1539 124.4 +0.50 0.00 0.943 48.8% +23 -27 — 43.5% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 1–0 — -0.52 2010 1444 105.5 -1.26 -3.39 0.883 47.3% +88 +19 — 33.3% -0.80 2–7 (22%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.96
25 2017 1721 140.3 +2.20 +2.13 1.126 52.2% +4 -118 — 57.4% +0.51 5–10 (33%) 5–4 (56%) 97.5 -0.59 2011 1440 104.6 -0.47 -2.33 0.929 48.2% +40 +36 — 34.1% -1.32 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) 97.9 +0.55
26 2018 1906 152.9 +2.58 +4.18 1.157 53.0% +14 -273 — 61.1% +1.10 9–5 (64%) 1–3 (25%) 102.8 -1.43 2012 1567 120.4 +0.94 -2.00 0.973 49.6% +13 -61 — 47.1% -0.16 4–6 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 97.4 +0.14
27 2019 1793 132.7 +1.42 +0.89 1.038 50.7% +55 -204 -179 55.6% +0.16 4–6 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.2 +1.10 2013 1464 92.4 -3.33 -3.82 0.734 43.3% +53 -36 — 16.7% -2.42 0–2 1–1 — -0.02
28 2020 1766 129.1 +2.56 +1.23 1.073 51.4% +32 — — 53.3% +0.03 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 98.7 +0.36 2014 1522 116.7 -0.48 -2.01 0.875 47.1% -13 -8 — 39.5% -0.87 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) 105.0 -0.15
29 2021 1714 121.2 -1.69 +0.38 0.952 48.9% -23 -55 — 44.1% -0.42 5–6 (45%) 3–1 (75%) 100.4 +0.25 2015 1460 100.1 -1.71 -4.00 0.797 45.3% +53 -24 — 28.6% -1.86 2–4 (33%) 1–0 — +0.21
30 2022 1717 128.6 +0.18 +0.03 0.981 49.6% +35 — -160 45.2% -0.11 8–2 (80%) 2–8 (20%) 101.7 -0.05 2016 1580 120.0 -0.40 -0.40 0.976 49.3% -22 -16 — 49.2% -0.27 2–3 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 102.8 -1.66
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1657 125.5 -1.45 -0.38 0.962 49.5% +18 -74 — 46.3% -0.16 5–7 (42%) 2–9 (18%) 94.8 -0.59
32 2024 1624 97.7 -3.97 -0.81 0.667 41.0% +19 — — 11.1% -3.00 0–1 — — -0.38 2018 1684 119.2 -0.79 -1.64 0.905 48.1% -42 +15 — 47.8% -0.27 8–3 (73%) 5–2 (71%) 108.1 -0.14
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1594 114.6 -1.35 -2.58 0.887 47.3% +33 -57 -130 32.9% -0.99 5–4 (56%) 3–6 (33%) 99.6 -0.25
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1540 98.6 -2.06 -1.56 0.767 44.0% — — — 11.1% -2.22 0–1 0–1 — -0.38
Career — 1931 138.9 +1.10 +1.45 1.038 50.7% +22 -151 -171 50.5% +0.07 38–44 (46%) 22–21 (51%) 100.4 -0.15 — 1703 118.5 -0.64 -1.98 0.911 48.0% +8 -5 -73 41.1% -0.62 40–52 (43%) 28–35 (44%) 98.1 -0.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.