H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Qiang Wang vs Venus Williams H2H: 1-3

Venus Williams holds a 3–1 lead over Qiang Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Venus Williams leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2019 Birmingham fourth round 6-3 6-2.

CHN Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 3
4 main draw meetings
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 21, 2019* Birmingham WTA 250 R16 Grass Venus Williams #55 6-3 6-2 Qiang Wang #15 Match data
May 29, 2018* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Qiang Wang #85 6-4 7-5 Venus Williams #9 Match data
Jul 6, 2017* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Venus Williams #11 4-6 6-4 6-1 Qiang Wang #55 Match data
May 30, 2017* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Venus Williams #11 6-4 7-6(3) Qiang Wang #52 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Qiang Wang #421 #12 2,946 1,925 128 125 50.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Qiang Wang Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
2012 0–3 0.0% #185 1,458 0 0 1994 1–1 50.0% 1,525 0 0
2013 1–1 50.0% #226 1,474 0 0 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
2014 1–2 33.3% #102 1,467 0 0 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
2015 4–14 22.2% #110 1,448 0 0 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
2016 9–11 45.0% #72 1,568 0 0 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
2017 24–19 55.8% #45 1,724 0 0 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
2018 37–21 63.8% #21 1,900 0 2 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
2019 23–18 56.1% #30 1,797 0 2 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
2020 7–6 53.8% #34 1,770 0 2 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
2021 9–13 40.9% #104 1,713 0 2 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
2022 13–13 50.0% #91 1,716 0 2 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
2024 0–4 0.0% #376 1,624 0 2 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47