H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Qiang Wang vs Yanina Wickmayer H2H: 1-0

Qiang Wang holds a 1–0 lead over Yanina Wickmayer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Qiang Wang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Qiang Wang won the 2022 Chennai first round 6-4 1-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Qiang Wang
China Age 34 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Yanina Wickmayer
Belgium Age 36 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Qiang Wang #101 6-4 1-6 6-4 Yanina Wickmayer #464 Match data Sep 15, 2022* R32 Chennai WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Qiang Wang #421 #12 2,946 1,931 129 127 50.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Yanina Wickmayer #765 #12 3,320 1,933 223 217 50.7% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Qiang Wang Yanina Wickmayer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2008 10–14 41.7% #73 1,540 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2009 32–16 66.7% #16 1,844 0 2
20 2012 0–3 0.0% #185 1,458 0 0 2010 31–21 59.6% #23 1,770 0 3
21 2013 1–1 50.0% #226 1,474 0 0 2011 28–18 60.9% #26 1,772 0 3
22 2014 1–2 33.3% #102 1,467 0 0 2012 29–26 52.7% #23 1,618 0 3
23 2015 4–14 22.2% #110 1,448 0 0 2013 17–24 41.5% #51 1,589 0 3
24 2016 9–12 42.9% #72 1,538 0 0 2014 13–19 40.6% #75 1,556 0 3
25 2017 24–19 55.8% #45 1,720 0 0 2015 18–17 51.4% #41 1,684 0 4
26 2018 37–21 63.8% #21 1,906 0 2 2016 19–24 44.2% #58 1,635 0 5
27 2019 23–18 56.1% #30 1,792 0 2 2017 11–14 44.0% #115 1,638 0 5
28 2020 7–6 53.8% #34 1,765 0 2 2018 3–5 37.5% #122 1,644 0 5
29 2021 10–14 41.7% #104 1,713 0 2 2019 2–2 50.0% #152 1,582 0 5
30 2022 13–13 50.0% #91 1,717 0 2 2020 0–1 0.0% #166 1,578 0 5
32 2024 0–4 0.0% #376 1,623 0 2 2022 2–3 40.0% #321 1,561 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2023 8–7 53.3% #71 1,655 0 5
34 — — — — — — — 2024 0–3 0.0% #765 1,532 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2025 0–3 0.0% — 1,501 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Qiang Wang Yanina Wickmayer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 5 10 15 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 19 11 30 63.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
20 2012 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 22 14 36 61.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 13 10 23 56.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 2014 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 16 15 31 51.6% 7 7 14 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
23 2015 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2013 10 14 24 41.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2016 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 9 14 23 39.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
25 2017 18 13 31 58.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2015 13 12 25 52.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 2018 32 15 47 68.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2016 15 15 30 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
27 2019 16 10 26 61.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2017 8 9 17 47.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 2020 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
29 2021 4 9 13 30.8% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — 2019 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 2022 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2024 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2022 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
Career — 103 89 192 53.6% 21 27 48 43.8% 5 11 16 31.2% — — — — — 141 139 280 50.4% 36 40 76 47.4% 40 34 74 54.1% 6 4 10 60.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 239/257 of Qiang Wang's and 396/440 of Yanina Wickmayer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Qiang Wang Yanina Wickmayer
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 20/24 3.6 4.6 59.0% 66.6% 45.8% 56.1% 42.9% 58.2% 40.4%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 47/48 2.3 4.2 64.9% 65.0% 47.0% 48.0% 51.3% 58.7% 46.6%
20 2012 3/3 0.0 2.3 63.7% 51.1% 37.0% 33.2% 54.2% 46.3% 37.9% 2010 49/52 3.2 4.0 65.2% 65.8% 50.0% 55.9% 47.0% 60.1% 44.2%
21 2013 1/2 2.0 1.0 69.4% 59.3% 57.7% 37.5% 26.3% 58.8% 47.6% 2011 43/46 2.8 3.4 66.4% 62.9% 45.7% 48.4% 49.9% 56.9% 42.5%
22 2014 2/3 4.0 1.0 56.4% 70.6% 54.4% 81.8% 42.4% 62.7% 49.1% 2012 48/55 1.6 3.8 64.8% 60.4% 47.6% 48.1% 50.4% 55.7% 45.3%
23 2015 10/18 2.5 3.0 64.1% 59.0% 45.4% 48.0% 33.2% 53.6% 37.0% 2013 36/41 1.6 4.7 62.4% 62.1% 41.6% 53.8% 48.3% 54.4% 40.2%
24 2016 18/22 2.2 2.9 63.0% 62.4% 44.4% 53.3% 46.6% 55.9% 41.6% 2014 31/32 1.6 4.5 60.8% 59.2% 43.5% 46.3% 43.7% 52.5% 39.2%
25 2017 43/43 2.7 1.8 63.1% 63.9% 50.5% 55.7% 49.0% 58.9% 46.3% 2015 23/35 2.8 4.7 64.6% 63.4% 46.1% 56.5% 41.3% 57.4% 38.2%
26 2018 57/58 2.6 1.7 62.4% 65.2% 48.8% 52.5% 49.8% 59.1% 47.4% 2016 35/43 3.9 3.6 62.9% 65.8% 43.4% 43.8% 49.2% 57.4% 40.9%
27 2019 40/41 2.4 2.1 61.7% 63.9% 49.5% 56.1% 52.1% 58.0% 43.6% 2017 25/25 3.3 3.4 62.7% 65.5% 43.0% 59.3% 40.7% 57.0% 38.8%
28 2020 13/13 1.3 1.8 60.2% 63.2% 53.7% 51.1% 44.2% 59.4% 43.6% 2018 8/8 1.9 2.3 67.2% 62.1% 44.1% 48.5% 38.3% 56.1% 40.4%
29 2021 22/24 3.5 3.6 58.5% 60.7% 44.5% 53.9% 39.5% 53.9% 43.9% 2019 4/4 5.8 3.5 61.1% 61.6% 50.3% 60.8% 38.1% 57.0% 40.3%
30 2022 26/26 2.1 1.7 63.8% 61.7% 47.7% 53.8% 50.2% 56.6% 42.6% 2020 1/1 5.0 3.0 46.9% 69.6% 42.3% 0.0% 0.0% 55.1% 32.2%
32 2024 4/4 1.0 2.5 61.2% 54.3% 27.9% 38.6% 51.4% 45.2% 36.5% 2022 5/5 1.6 2.6 66.4% 66.2% 34.6% 58.7% 37.6% 55.6% 45.4%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 15/15 2.6 4.3 64.2% 61.8% 39.4% 55.5% 53.6% 53.7% 44.3%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 3/3 1.0 4.3 70.9% 61.3% 39.0% 42.9% 30.9% 55.1% 41.1%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 3/3 1.0 4.0 65.6% 45.4% 29.2% 30.6% 29.4% 40.1% 36.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Qiang Wang Yanina Wickmayer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1541 118.5 +1.10 -2.21 0.965 49.3% -12 — +153 45.6% -0.37 3–6 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 96.9 -0.19
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1845 138.9 +2.89 +2.24 1.129 52.5% -67 -217 -63 63.4% +0.73 9–9 (50%) 9–5 (64%) 108.5 -0.38
20 2012 1459 93.4 -2.59 -4.30 0.705 42.2% +20 — — 14.3% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.34 2010 1771 147.6 +3.55 +1.24 1.108 52.1% -25 -73 +42 58.2% +0.54 9–9 (50%) 10–6 (63%) 99.6 -0.09
21 2013 1474 106.8 +1.03 +1.18 1.155 52.7% — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — -0.12 2011 1772 137.9 +1.53 -0.96 0.987 49.9% -34 -18 +65 58.7% +0.55 13–5 (72%) 6–5 (55%) 109.7 -0.40
22 2014 1468 102.3 -0.40 -0.04 1.315 56.2% +13 — — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.36 2012 1618 128.3 +0.06 +1.37 1.022 50.5% +42 +98 +183 54.1% +0.12 6–10 (38%) 7–7 (50%) 93.9 +3.14
23 2015 1449 112.8 -2.12 -2.78 0.797 45.2% +43 — — 31.8% -1.18 2–6 (25%) 1–1 — +0.30 2013 1590 122.3 -1.06 -2.39 0.882 47.6% +21 +17 +202 44.3% -0.46 8–9 (47%) 5–5 (50%) 96.9 -0.49
24 2016 1539 124.4 +0.50 0.00 0.943 48.8% +23 -27 — 43.5% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 1–0 — -0.52 2014 1556 109.0 -2.75 -3.18 0.825 46.0% -10 +67 +179 42.4% -1.06 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 101.0 +0.61
25 2017 1721 140.3 +2.20 +2.13 1.126 52.2% +4 -118 — 57.4% +0.51 5–10 (33%) 5–4 (56%) 97.5 -0.59 2015 1684 131.2 +0.06 -2.08 0.896 48.0% -6 -86 +30 50.6% +0.10 8–5 (62%) 0–4 (0%) 100.6 -1.93
26 2018 1906 152.9 +2.58 +4.18 1.157 53.0% +14 -273 — 61.1% +1.10 9–5 (64%) 1–3 (25%) 102.8 -1.43 2016 1635 130.0 +1.11 -1.54 0.959 49.0% +11 -60 +35 46.6% -0.07 7–10 (41%) 3–10 (23%) 90.8 -1.27
27 2019 1793 132.7 +1.42 +0.89 1.038 50.7% +55 -204 -179 55.6% +0.16 4–6 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.2 +1.10 2017 1638 118.0 +0.72 -2.73 0.903 48.1% +22 -82 +35 43.6% -0.56 3–2 (60%) 4–4 (50%) 101.3 -0.90
28 2020 1766 129.1 +2.56 +1.23 1.073 51.4% +32 — — 53.3% +0.03 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 98.7 +0.36 2018 1644 116.3 -0.80 -1.10 0.921 48.4% +42 — +44 37.5% -0.75 — 0–2 — +0.44
29 2021 1714 121.2 -1.69 +0.38 0.952 48.9% -23 -55 — 44.1% -0.42 5–6 (45%) 3–1 (75%) 100.4 +0.25 2019 1582 105.8 0.00 +0.01 0.938 48.6% — — — 50.0% -0.70 1–1 1–0 — +0.07
30 2022 1717 128.6 +0.18 +0.03 0.981 49.6% +35 — -160 45.2% -0.11 8–2 (80%) 2–8 (20%) 101.7 -0.05 2020 1578 101.7 -0.40 +1.21 0.717 42.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.23
32 2024 1624 97.7 -3.97 -0.81 0.667 41.0% +19 — — 11.1% -3.00 0–1 — — -0.38 2022 1561 112.3 -0.11 +0.15 1.022 50.5% +6 — — 45.5% +0.09 0–1 — — -0.10
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1655 132.7 -1.00 +0.89 0.957 49.0% 0 — — 56.7% +0.27 1–1 1–3 (25%) — -0.31
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1533 98.0 -1.89 -3.41 0.914 47.1% -5 — — 25.0% -1.38 0–2 1–1 — +0.10
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1502 92.0 -2.96 -3.50 0.612 38.4% — — — 14.3% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.17
Career — 1931 138.9 +1.10 +1.45 1.038 50.7% +22 -151 -171 50.5% +0.07 38–44 (46%) 22–21 (51%) 100.4 -0.15 — 1934 133.4 +0.75 -0.56 0.975 49.5% -5 -28 +78 51.3% 0.00 72–75 (49%) 54–60 (47%) 98.9 -0.40

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.