Rebecca Marino
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lin Zhu | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 24, 2023 | H2H |
| Katie Boulter | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jan 14, 2025 | H2H |
| Roberta Vinci | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jan 5, 2012 | H2H |
| Tatjana Maria | 1 | 1 | 2 | Sep 10, 2025 | H2H |
| Magda Linette | 0 | 2 | 2 | Aug 8, 2024 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Rebecca Marino vs Bibiane Schoofs H2H: 0-1
Bibiane Schoofs holds a 1–0 lead over Rebecca Marino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bibiane Schoofs leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bibiane Schoofs won the 2011 Luxembourg round of 16 1-6 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bibiane Schoofs | 1-6 6-1 7-5 | Rebecca Marino | Match data | Oct 21, 2011* | R16 | Luxembourg | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rebecca Marino | #422 | #38 | 1,322 | 1,726 | 48 | 78 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bibiane Schoofs | #1,207 | #142 | 448 | 1,573 | 5 | 9 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rebecca Marino | Bibiane Schoofs | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #356 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #178 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2010 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #104 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2011 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #64 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #161 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #215 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2021 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #145 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #174 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2022 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #63 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #168 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2023 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #176 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2024 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #102 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2025 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #178 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #422 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Rebecca Marino | Bibiane Schoofs | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 2008 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2009 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2010 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2011 | 9 | 13 | 22 | 40.9% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2012 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2013 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2018 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2021 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 31 | 2022 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2019 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 32 | 2023 | 4 | 12 | 16 | 25.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2020 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2024 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2025 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2026 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 37 | 59 | 96 | 38.5% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | — | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 117/124 of Rebecca Marino's and 11/11 of Bibiane Schoofs's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Rebecca Marino | Bibiane Schoofs | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | 2009 | 2/2 | 8.5 | 0.5 | 62.3% | 63.7% | 49.0% | 63.9% | 66.7% | 58.1% | 29.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2010 | 5/5 | 9.2 | 2.4 | 57.1% | 77.2% | 48.4% | 78.1% | 26.7% | 64.7% | 38.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2011 | 30/33 | 6.5 | 3.6 | 55.9% | 67.5% | 47.2% | 56.7% | 51.8% | 58.4% | 36.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2012 | 3/3 | 4.3 | 5.3 | 54.2% | 63.3% | 37.5% | 56.3% | 42.1% | 51.1% | 33.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2013 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 52.5% | 57.1% | 26.3% | 20.0% | 0.0% | 42.5% | 28.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2018 | 3/3 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 51.3% | 72.9% | 53.6% | 69.0% | 72.2% | 63.6% | 40.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2021 | 9/9 | 6.4 | 1.6 | 56.4% | 71.1% | 47.5% | 46.0% | 31.2% | 60.8% | 39.0% | 2018 | 3/3 | 0.7 | 3.7 | 70.3% | 57.6% | 33.9% | 58.1% | 43.3% | 50.9% | 42.7% |
| 31 | 2022 | 26/26 | 6.7 | 2.7 | 57.5% | 69.3% | 51.2% | 56.2% | 41.3% | 61.7% | 40.2% | 2019 | 7/7 | 0.9 | 4.7 | 64.1% | 48.9% | 41.2% | 51.0% | 57.8% | 46.4% | 43.2% |
| 32 | 2023 | 25/25 | 6.9 | 3.8 | 58.2% | 66.4% | 41.2% | 53.2% | 36.3% | 55.9% | 35.7% | 2020 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 11.0 | 61.3% | 60.5% | 25.0% | 44.4% | 22.2% | 46.8% | 41.2% |
| 33 | 2024 | 7/7 | 5.3 | 4.1 | 51.8% | 62.7% | 41.9% | 41.2% | 35.6% | 52.9% | 37.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2025 | 5/9 | 6.8 | 3.4 | 56.9% | 63.4% | 41.9% | 46.6% | 35.1% | 54.2% | 40.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2026 | 1/1 | 10.0 | 7.0 | 55.7% | 71.8% | 41.9% | 62.5% | 16.7% | 58.6% | 37.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 117/126 | 6.6 | 3.3 | 56.6% | 67.8% | 46.1% | 54.7% | 41.6% | 58.3% | 37.5% | — | 11/14 | 0.8 | 5.0 | 65.5% | 52.3% | 37.7% | 52.4% | 50.6% | 47.6% | 42.9% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Rebecca Marino | Bibiane Schoofs | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 2008 | 1502 | 100.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.50 | — | 1–0 | — | +0.22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2009 | 1503 | 99.0 | -1.15 | -0.54 | 0.714 | 46.9% | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.50 | — | — | — | +0.26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2010 | 1551 | 121.9 | +3.02 | -0.35 | 1.083 | 50.9% | +27 | — | — | 54.5% | +0.46 | 1–0 | 2–2 (50%) | — | -0.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2011 | 1562 | 121.1 | +1.67 | -5.16 | 0.879 | 48.1% | -5 | +10 | +47 | 44.0% | -0.27 | 6–5 (55%) | 3–4 (43%) | 102.0 | +0.64 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2012 | 1531 | 101.0 | -2.11 | -2.45 | 0.677 | 42.9% | -16 | — | — | 0.0% | -2.67 | — | — | — | -0.30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2013 | 1523 | 99.9 | -0.72 | -1.42 | 0.492 | 34.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | -0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1530 | 106.5 | — | — | — | — | +27 | — | — | 50.0% | 0.00 | 2–0 | — | — | +0.05 |
| 27 | 2018 | 1547 | 106.2 | -1.33 | -1.49 | 1.116 | 52.0% | -22 | — | — | 57.1% | +1.14 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2019 | 1531 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1498 | 97.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2021 | 1562 | 122.5 | +1.57 | -0.55 | 0.994 | 49.3% | -18 | — | — | 45.0% | -0.65 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | 0.00 | 2018 | 1504 | 100.8 | -2.24 | -0.66 | 0.870 | 46.8% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | — | — | — | +0.13 |
| 31 | 2022 | 1688 | 123.8 | +2.87 | -2.02 | 1.048 | 50.8% | -3 | — | -51 | 50.0% | +0.02 | 3–7 (30%) | 4–3 (57%) | 98.9 | +1.40 | 2019 | 1496 | 111.1 | -3.67 | -1.43 | 0.806 | 45.0% | +41 | — | — | 23.1% | -1.92 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.05 |
| 32 | 2023 | 1586 | 119.8 | -0.86 | -5.13 | 0.809 | 46.0% | +6 | -46 | -9 | 33.3% | -1.30 | 2–5 (29%) | 7–4 (64%) | 97.1 | -0.07 | 2020 | 1468 | 105.5 | +0.19 | +0.54 | 0.774 | 43.8% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.21 |
| 33 | 2024 | 1678 | 109.7 | -1.30 | -2.06 | 0.788 | 45.3% | +18 | — | — | 20.0% | -1.80 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2025 | 1620 | 115.9 | -1.68 | -1.01 | 0.886 | 47.3% | -27 | — | — | 38.1% | -0.62 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–1 | — | -0.01 | 2022 | 1439 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2026 | 1603 | 104.4 | +1.06 | -1.78 | 0.905 | 47.3% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | -0.07 | 2023 | 1410 | 97.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1408 | 98.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1727 | 123.8 | +0.88 | -3.23 | 0.900 | 48.1% | -4 | -11 | -4 | 40.9% | -0.58 | 15–21 (42%) | 19–16 (54%) | 100.1 | +1.44 | — | 1574 | 106.9 | -2.93 | -1.04 | 0.819 | 45.4% | +35 | — | — | 31.0% | -1.41 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–1 | — | -0.57 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Bibiane Schoofs
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elina Svitolina | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 13, 2020 | H2H |
| Elise Mertens | 0 | 1 | 1 | Oct 17, 2019 | H2H |
| Saisai Zheng | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 12, 2019 | H2H |
| Arantxa Rus | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jun 13, 2019 | H2H |
| Sara Errani | 0 | 1 | 1 | Apr 12, 2019 | H2H |