H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Rebecca Marino vs Bibiane Schoofs H2H: 0-1
Bibiane Schoofs holds a 1–0 lead over Rebecca Marino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bibiane Schoofs leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bibiane Schoofs won the 2011 Luxembourg fourth round 1-6 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 38
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2011* | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Bibiane Schoofs | 1-6 6-1 7-5 | Rebecca Marino | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rebecca Marino | #361 | #38 | 1,322 | 1,726 | 48 | 77 | 38.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bibiane Schoofs | #1,207 | #142 | 448 | 1,573 | 5 | 9 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rebecca Marino | Bibiane Schoofs | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #356 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #178 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2010 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #104 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2011 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #64 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #161 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #215 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2021 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #145 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #174 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2022 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #63 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #168 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2023 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #176 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2024 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #102 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2025 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #178 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |