H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Rebecca Marino vs Gisela Dulko H2H: 0-1

Gisela Dulko holds a 1–0 lead over Rebecca Marino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gisela Dulko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gisela Dulko won the 2011 US Open round of 128 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rebecca Marino
Canada Age 35 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Gisela Dulko
ARG Age 41 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Gisela Dulko #57 6-3 6-3 Rebecca Marino #41 Match data Aug 31, 2011* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rebecca Marino #422 #38 1,322 1,726 48 78 38.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gisela Dulko #305 #26 1,695 1,797 192 181 51.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rebecca Marino Gisela Dulko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% #188 1,487 0 0
17 2008 1–1 50.0% #356 1,501 0 0 2002 4–3 57.1% #154 1,527 0 0
18 2009 1–1 50.0% #178 1,502 0 0 2003 5–7 41.7% #125 1,516 0 0
19 2010 3–2 60.0% #104 1,550 0 0 2004 22–19 53.7% #33 1,705 0 0
20 2011 14–19 42.4% #64 1,561 0 0 2005 32–23 58.2% #26 1,725 0 0
21 2012 0–3 0.0% #420 1,530 0 0 2006 16–23 41.0% #59 1,573 0 0
22 2013 0–1 0.0% #418 1,522 0 0 2007 29–23 55.8% #37 1,698 0 2
23 — — — — — — — 2008 18–21 46.2% #51 1,629 0 3
24 — — — — — — — 2009 28–20 58.3% #36 1,730 0 3
25 — — — — — — — 2010 21–21 50.0% #48 1,687 0 3
26 — — — — — — — 2011 15–15 50.0% #67 1,651 0 4
27 2018 2–1 66.7% #215 1,547 0 0 2012 2–5 28.6% #305 1,605 0 4
30 2021 4–5 44.4% #145 1,561 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2022 12–14 46.2% #63 1,688 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2023 7–18 28.0% #176 1,586 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2024 1–6 14.3% #102 1,677 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2025 3–6 33.3% #178 1,619 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2026 0–1 0.0% #422 1,603 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rebecca Marino Gisela Dulko
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2008 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2009 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 2010 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 17 12 29 58.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
20 2011 9 13 22 40.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2005 20 16 36 55.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
21 2012 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 6 13 19 31.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
22 2013 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 18 13 31 58.1% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 3 13 16 18.8% 11 6 17 64.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 12 9 21 57.1% 14 9 23 60.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 11 12 23 47.8% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 6 11 17 35.3% 9 4 13 69.2% — — — — — — — —
27 2018 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2021 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2022 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2023 4 12 16 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2025 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2026 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 37 59 96 38.5% 3 7 10 30.0% 8 12 20 40.0% — — — — — 95 107 202 47.0% 81 58 139 58.3% 15 14 29 51.7% 1 2 3 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 117/124 of Rebecca Marino's and 229/365 of Gisela Dulko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Rebecca Marino Gisela Dulko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2009 2/2 8.5 0.5 62.3% 63.7% 49.0% 63.9% 66.7% 58.1% 29.9% 2003 1/12 2.0 5.0 57.5% 58.5% 47.9% 57.1% 30.8% 54.0% 40.2%
19 2010 5/5 9.2 2.4 57.1% 77.2% 48.4% 78.1% 26.7% 64.7% 38.2% 2004 9/41 3.0 4.9 55.9% 67.7% 45.0% 46.7% 55.4% 58.0% 42.7%
20 2011 30/33 6.5 3.6 55.9% 67.5% 47.2% 56.7% 51.8% 58.4% 36.5% 2005 6/55 2.3 4.8 56.5% 59.6% 39.2% 49.8% 44.7% 50.9% 48.8%
21 2012 3/3 4.3 5.3 54.2% 63.3% 37.5% 56.3% 42.1% 51.1% 33.1% 2006 26/39 1.5 4.9 59.7% 59.1% 42.3% 49.9% 52.7% 52.2% 42.9%
22 2013 1/1 2.0 4.0 52.5% 57.1% 26.3% 20.0% 0.0% 42.5% 28.3% 2007 36/52 1.0 4.3 61.7% 58.4% 42.9% 47.3% 47.6% 52.4% 43.2%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 35/39 1.4 3.5 61.9% 59.3% 47.2% 48.7% 48.3% 54.7% 43.0%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 44/48 2.7 4.2 58.1% 66.0% 44.8% 56.5% 48.7% 56.8% 44.9%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 39/42 2.3 3.8 60.6% 60.6% 46.5% 50.4% 51.1% 55.0% 46.3%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 28/30 2.0 4.3 57.2% 65.6% 43.9% 55.2% 49.5% 56.4% 45.7%
27 2018 3/3 5.0 3.0 51.3% 72.9% 53.6% 69.0% 72.2% 63.6% 40.6% 2012 5/7 0.6 5.0 52.5% 48.8% 36.6% 30.4% 34.6% 43.0% 40.8%
30 2021 9/9 6.4 1.6 56.4% 71.1% 47.5% 46.0% 31.2% 60.8% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2022 26/26 6.7 2.7 57.5% 69.3% 51.2% 56.2% 41.3% 61.7% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2023 25/25 6.9 3.8 58.2% 66.4% 41.2% 53.2% 36.3% 55.9% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2024 7/7 5.3 4.1 51.8% 62.7% 41.9% 41.2% 35.6% 52.9% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2025 5/9 6.8 3.4 56.9% 63.4% 41.9% 46.6% 35.1% 54.2% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2026 1/1 10.0 7.0 55.7% 71.8% 41.9% 62.5% 16.7% 58.6% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 117/126 6.6 3.3 56.6% 67.8% 46.1% 54.7% 41.6% 58.3% 37.5% — 229/373 1.9 4.2 59.5% 61.5% 44.5% 50.8% 49.2% 54.5% 44.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rebecca Marino Gisela Dulko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1488 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01
17 2008 1502 100.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — 1–0 — +0.22 2002 1528 110.5 — — — — -9 +54 — 46.7% +0.27 2–1 (67%) — — +0.54
18 2009 1503 99.0 -1.15 -0.54 0.714 46.9% — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.26 2003 1516 103.4 -0.14 -1.46 0.874 47.6% -8 +76 — 36.0% -0.44 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) 99.3 +0.47
19 2010 1551 121.9 +3.02 -0.35 1.083 50.9% +27 — — 54.5% +0.46 1–0 2–2 (50%) — -0.02 2004 1706 135.1 +1.79 -0.44 1.017 50.3% -27 -95 -100 52.9% -0.25 3–4 (43%) 9–1 (90%) 106.2 -0.94
20 2011 1562 121.1 +1.67 -5.16 0.879 48.1% -5 +10 +47 44.0% -0.27 6–5 (55%) 3–4 (43%) 102.0 +0.64 2005 1725 129.6 -1.55 +1.29 0.994 49.6% -23 -48 -80 55.8% +0.32 11–8 (58%) 7–5 (58%) 105.8 +0.73
21 2012 1531 101.0 -2.11 -2.45 0.677 42.9% -16 — — 0.0% -2.67 — — — -0.30 2006 1574 115.8 -2.53 -1.31 0.898 47.8% +11 +73 +112 44.0% -0.75 3–5 (38%) 7–5 (58%) 98.0 +1.89
22 2013 1523 99.9 -0.72 -1.42 0.492 34.4% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.09 2007 1699 129.5 -2.86 -0.86 0.906 47.9% +7 -19 — 53.8% +0.26 8–7 (53%) 6–3 (67%) 104.8 +0.85
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1630 120.3 -0.30 -0.40 0.950 49.0% -74 +137 +31 46.3% -0.11 7–3 (70%) 4–6 (40%) 103.7 -1.13
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1731 135.0 +0.97 +0.64 1.040 50.8% -69 +46 -30 55.7% +0.42 7–3 (70%) 5–6 (45%) 102.2 -0.13
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1687 136.7 -0.13 +2.36 1.028 50.5% -9 +74 — 49.5% -0.11 7–8 (47%) 4–9 (31%) 96.3 -1.55
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1652 134.5 +0.74 +1.84 1.047 50.8% -36 +153 — 51.6% +0.16 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.6 -0.48
27 2018 1547 106.2 -1.33 -1.49 1.116 52.0% -22 — — 57.1% +1.14 1–0 0–1 — +0.20 2012 1606 102.0 -2.95 +0.27 0.715 41.8% -21 — — 15.4% -2.54 1–0 0–1 — -0.18
28 2019 1531 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2021 1562 122.5 +1.57 -0.55 0.994 49.3% -18 — — 45.0% -0.65 1–1 1–1 — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2022 1688 123.8 +2.87 -2.02 1.048 50.8% -3 — -51 50.0% +0.02 3–7 (30%) 4–3 (57%) 98.9 +1.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2023 1586 119.8 -0.86 -5.13 0.809 46.0% +6 -46 -9 33.3% -1.30 2–5 (29%) 7–4 (64%) 97.1 -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2024 1678 109.7 -1.30 -2.06 0.788 45.3% +18 — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2025 1620 115.9 -1.68 -1.01 0.886 47.3% -27 — — 38.1% -0.62 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2026 1603 104.4 +1.06 -1.78 0.905 47.3% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1727 123.8 +0.88 -3.23 0.900 48.1% -4 -11 -4 40.9% -0.58 15–21 (42%) 19–16 (54%) 100.1 +1.44 — 1798 133.1 -0.56 +0.42 0.974 49.4% -23 +50 -10 50.4% -0.03 54–43 (56%) 44–40 (52%) 107.2 +0.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.