H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:15 UTC
Rebecca Marino vs Kirsten Flipkens
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Rebecca Marino vs Kirsten Flipkens.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 40
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rebecca Marino | #361 | #38 | 1,322 | 1,726 | 48 | 77 | 38.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kirsten Flipkens | #531 | #13 | 2,961 | 1,829 | 198 | 221 | 47.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rebecca Marino | Kirsten Flipkens | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #356 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #380 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #178 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2010 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #104 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #202 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #64 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #104 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #111 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #81 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #192 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 13–4 | 76.5% | #54 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2018 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #215 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #20 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #45 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #85 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2021 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #145 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #65 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2022 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #63 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #74 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2023 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #176 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #47 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2024 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #102 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #71 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 2025 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #178 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #86 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #311 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,685 | 0 | 1 |